Request for Scorecards--Pacquiao / Marquez II

[Julius Rain]

don't listen to ice, when it comes to pac his as bias against him as it gets. the guy is like vd always against him and will find anyway to discredit pacs win.

[Julius Rain]

it was a close fight jmm is great but he came up short again. the kd came back and hunted him.

[ICB]

don't listen to ice, when it comes to pac his as bias against him as it gets. the guy is like vd always against him and will find anyway to discredit pacs win.

Well i could say the same about you having Pacquiao winning, like i said i gave Marquez close rounds 1 and 4 which made my scorecard wider. But i want to watch it again because my scoring is never 100 percent accurate when im typing and watching at the same time.

[Julius Rain]

don't listen to ice, when it comes to pac his as bias against him as it gets. the guy is like vd always against him and will find anyway to discredit pacs win.

Well i could say the same about you having Pacquiao winning, like i said i gave Marquez close rounds 1 and 4 which made my scorecard wider. But i want to watch it again because my scoring is never 100 percent accurate when im typing and watching at the same time.

yea everyone needs to rewatch it. i'll admit im excited now, but imo pac won. jmm came up short cause he got tagged hard with punches that counted more. plus waiting on pac to counter him doesn't always help you win the fight it makes you look like your just waiting to lose the fight.

pac controlled what happen but when jmm decided to attack he actually did better then just wait to counter. pacs power still made him come up short and hesitant, but imo if pac decided to explode more he would of stopped jmm early. Like i said the extra weight prove me wrng it actually cost pac to be lazy meaning he doesn't explode as much as before. when he does its clear that his speed is a lot more of jmms worry and a lot more dominant then his pure power even though he drop jmm with an easy little lefty.