Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
The Board should re-think it's compulsory retirement policy. Good refs are usually the experienced ones. It makes no sense to force retirement on an able referee just based on age. They should look at each case on it's merits. As long as the referee isn't making misakes and is fit and able to do his job he should be allowed to carry on. They could even come up with some from of test to check their sharpness
Vann has been a constant in the fight game and I for one think it would be a shame for an outdated policy to prevent him carrying on. Is this yet another example of the British Boxing Board being woefully out of date with the rest of the world....
'To speak with his equal and irish man is forced to talk with God...'
Array
I think the BBBC might have problems with the the age discrimination act where your not allowed to discriminate against anyone in the work place purely on age
Array
Theres always Germany.
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
Array
Array
he's alright.......he let down Pernell Whitaker badly in the Chavez fight but he's alright![]()
When God said to the both of us "Which one of you wants to be Sugar Ray?" I guess I didnt raise my hand fast enough
Charley Burley
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks