Quote Originally Posted by GAME View Post
Quote Originally Posted by hitmandonny View Post
There are mnany that would dispute Taylors victories, but I wont go there.
If the judges award a fight to fighter A then Fighter A hits the records and goes down in history as the winner.

Many fighters have certain styles that they like to fight against. Some like straight ahead aggresive fighters, others like defensive guys. Bernard Hopkins likes and is strong against Southpaws.
This will allow him some successes against Calzaghe. He will look to negate Joe's advantage with tactical movement.
It's up to Joe to make the fight and takle care of himself so he doesn't get countered.

As I said, activity should do it, but activity with intelligence is the key.

If I remember there was nothing in those fights but the fact is Taylor gave Hopkins all he could handle . We saw Jermaine vs Spinks and the guy doesnt throw any punches compared to Joe. Hopkins is going to have to spoil Joes work and theres going to come a point where he has to stand his ground and fight and I just cant see him coming out on top

Joe Cortez didnt stand for any dirty work from Hatton vs Floyd so I dont see why he should stand for any dirty work from Hopkins in this one.
Sorry Game but just because Taylor struggled against Spinks doesn't mean anything, Spinks was very defensive and is a hard fight for near enough any fighter out there, he would make anyone look bad. Taylor was also very cautious against Hopkins and relied mostly on his great jab plus Taylor is a very good athlete. Calzaghe will not be cautious and just rely on his jab because that isn't Calzaghe's style. He is an aggressive unorthodox southpaw. Who overwhelms his opponents with punching angles and his almost unreal work rate.