Quote Originally Posted by BIG H
I've always said that Hearns was good chin short of being better than Hagler and Leonard - and that his long legs let him down by going to jelly when he got hit.

Somebody (Stebs) on the other Hearns thread mentioned that Hearns was well ahead after 12 rounds of the first fight with Leonard, and I think there is little doubt he won their 2nd fight.

So if 12 round fights came in sooner, would history have Hearns above Leonard in the all time great stakes?

I think the answer is YES
No..No...NO!...Leonard would have fought completely different...so would hearns.....traing is different and so is the fight plan.....You cannot go by that......well if Zab would have fought PBF in a four rounder Zab would be champ....doesn't make sense....