So because b hop hurt cal on two occasions he should have won the fight....right. There is now way you can win a fight only landing half as much as your opponent doesn't matter if they're harder shots or not really.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
So because b hop hurt cal on two occasions he should have won the fight....right. There is now way you can win a fight only landing half as much as your opponent doesn't matter if they're harder shots or not really.
I have never doubted CalZlappy
He even sex played B-POP and drilled the old man in the culo
![]()
![]()
Array
I scored the fight.
7-5 rounds for Joe.
With round 1, 10-8 for Hopkins.
Score: 114-113 for Joe Calzaghe.
I had it 6-6 with the knockdown deciding the fight, I was dissapointed with Calzaghe, I thought there was no way if they fought at a distance that Calzaghe would be so utterly outclassed. THe rounds he did win were simply because he was the busier fight, He showed no technique or ability to adapt to what B-Hop was doing, I thought even in the rounds he won that it was just because B-Hop wasn't throwing back. I mean B-Hop was so tired he needed that 5 minute break IMO to finish the fight on his feet, and yet Calzaghe couldn't land hardly anything. I just watched B-Hop-RJJ this morning and Roy landed at least twice as many meaningful punches in that fight than Calzaghe did in this fight.
I gave hop 4 rounds, calz 7 rounds and 1 round a draw, giving 115,113 calzaghe. But i guess its because i gave 1 round a draw as it was too evenly matched i thought.
rnd 1 hop, 10,8
rnd 2 hop, 10,9
rnd 3 hop, 10,9
rnd 4 calz, 10,9 (the turning point where calz dropped his gloves and you could see his confidence and skill starting to come out)
rnd 5 calz, 10,9
rnd 6 draw
rnd 7 calz, 10,9
rnd 8 calz, 10,9
rnd 9 calz, 10,9
rnd 10 hop, 10,9
rnd 11 calz, 10,9
rnd 12 calz, 10,9
Good scoring mate!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks