Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Hopkins was a tough cookie, but theres no way calz lost that.
He came down from a knock down in round 1 to start dominating the fight at the end.
So you score it the same as the bias african american female judge?
I gave it 115 to 113 calzaghe.
Calzaghe clearly won rounds 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12. You cant give those rounds to hopkins or even a draw.
That means even with the knock down in the first hopkins can only score a max of 5 rounds against jc.
I suggest you check the fight again mate, no offense to you but i cant see how you can not give joe those rounds![]()
Well, in fairness to the Hopkin'sfans, if you count all those illegal blows in Nard's favor, Nard wins.
Hopkins didnt need to start being dirty like that, the replay clearly showed they werent low blows.
What about the headbutts and clinching from bhop?
If they were low blows then bhop got exactly what he deserved tbh...the amouny of illegal head butts he used and constant holding evened it out.
For heavens sake, hopkins headbutted calzaghe right infront of cortez on one occassion yet nothing was done!
Array
What a bunch of sore losers
You are acting like B-Hop
JC didn't beat America he beat an American fighter LOL and did the macarena on his ass!!!.
Last edited by Puya; 04-20-2008 at 09:16 AM.
Que Viva Puerto Rico
Hidden Content
Array
calzaghe did not dominate the fight, i hate when people use the word dominate. dominating a opponent is like lacy- calzaghe, hopkins- trinidad or winky- trinidad. calzaghe i felt lost the fight, he was not the same joe in there, the fight was close but bhop should of gotta the fight. i felt he won.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks