Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

[ICB]

What kind of fighter does he amount to really? Definitely not someone you would call great. Remove all those illegal blows, headbutts rabbit punches, lowblows, holding, and play-acting, he is reduced to nothing but an average fighter.

Ridiculous post have you never seen his fight vs Tito or any of his other good fights for that matter ?? his fight vs Tito was one of the best boxing exhibitions i've ever seen in Middleweight boxing history, bad rep for bad mouthing a great fighter like Hopkins.

[JLAQ]

What kind of fighter does he amount to really? Definitely not someone you would call great. Remove all those illegal blows, headbutts rabbit punches, lowblows, holding, and play-acting, he is reduced to nothing but an average fighter.

Ridiculous post have you never seen his fight vs Tito or any of his other good fights for that matter ?? his fight vs Tito was one of the best boxing exhibitions i've ever seen in Middleweight boxing history, bad rep for bad mouthing a great fighter like Hopkins.

We all saw the Tito fight, and Nard was clearly the bigger man. And Tito was all so predictable, even DLH beat him IMO. Now take away all those illegal tactics Hopkins resorts to in his fights, which I think consists of almost 99% of his whole repertoire, and he is not a fighter to even talk about.

[rene69]

What kind of fighter does he amount to really? Definitely not someone you would call great. Remove all those illegal blows, headbutts rabbit punches, lowblows, holding, and play-acting, he is reduced to nothing but an average fighter.

Ridiculous post have you never seen his fight vs Tito or any of his other good fights for that matter ?? his fight vs Tito was one of the best boxing exhibitions i've ever seen in Middleweight boxing history, bad rep for bad mouthing a great fighter like Hopkins.

We all saw the Tito fight, and Nard was clearly the bigger man. And Tito was all so predictable, even DLH beat him IMO. Now take away all those illegal tactics Hopkins resorts to in his fights, which I think consists of almost 99% of his whole repertoire, and he is not a fighter to even talk about.

Actually...I thought Hopkins fought the cleanest fight of his career when he beat Tito.

[JLAQ]

Ridiculous post have you never seen his fight vs Tito or any of his other good fights for that matter ?? his fight vs Tito was one of the best boxing exhibitions i've ever seen in Middleweight boxing history, bad rep for bad mouthing a great fighter like Hopkins.

We all saw the Tito fight, and Nard was clearly the bigger man. And Tito was all so predictable, even DLH beat him IMO. Now take away all those illegal tactics Hopkins resorts to in his fights, which I think consists of almost 99% of his whole repertoire, and he is not a fighter to even talk about.

Actually...I thought Hopkins fought the cleanest fight of his career when he beat Tito.

Maybe he didn't need to as he was obviously fighting a much smaller fighter.

[rene69]

We all saw the Tito fight, and Nard was clearly the bigger man. And Tito was all so predictable, even DLH beat him IMO. Now take away all those illegal tactics Hopkins resorts to in his fights, which I think consists of almost 99% of his whole repertoire, and he is not a fighter to even talk about.

Actually...I thought Hopkins fought the cleanest fight of his career when he beat Tito.

Maybe he didn't need to as he was obviously fighting a much smaller fighter.

Ha! You said that his whole repertoire was 99% dirty, that's how he wins right?.
He used that other 1% to beat Trinidad. He fought a clean fight and won...reguardless.