what a robbery and you know it people

[LondonBB]

i cannot believe it that hopkins lost it was absolutely clear to me that he won it by at at least 3 rounds he was robbed i didnt have any money on it but i feel sick for bernard he clearly won it and to yvonne u silly woman u r so dumb im sure u had joe ahead , bullshit that white boy lost so bad he has lost all credability in the boxing world for getting the decision , im so mad for a hall of famer he deserved tghe win he won no doubt about it , what a fucking sick boxing world we live in . joe is a joker as we have seen tonight he is a hatton and got shown up for what he is a fake champion, im so mad what an injustice in boxing its a disgrace .

It wasn't a robbery but Calzaghe did look ordinary in the fight and i told everyone Hopkins would make Calzaghe look bad. I personally scored it 114-113 for Hopkins.

Hopkins was a tough cookie, but theres no way calz lost that.

He came down from a knock down in round 1 to start dominating the fight at the end.

So you score it the same as the bias african american female judge?

I gave it 115 to 113 calzaghe.

Calzaghe clearly won rounds 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12. You cant give those rounds to hopkins or even a draw.

That means even with the knock down in the first hopkins can only score a max of 5 rounds against jc.

I suggest you check the fight again mate, no offense to you but i cant see how you can not give joe those rounds

[JLAQ]

Well, in fairness to the Hopkin'sfans, if you count all those illegal blows in Nard's favor, Nard wins.

[LondonBB]

Well, in fairness to the Hopkin'sfans, if you count all those illegal blows in Nard's favor, Nard wins.

Hopkins didnt need to start being dirty like that, the replay clearly showed they werent low blows.

What about the headbutts and clinching from bhop?

If they were low blows then bhop got exactly what he deserved tbh...the amouny of illegal head butts he used and constant holding evened it out.

For heavens sake, hopkins headbutted calzaghe right infront of cortez on one occassion yet nothing was done!

[JLAQ]

Well, in fairness to the Hopkin'sfans, if you count all those illegal blows in Nard's favor, Nard wins.

Hopkins didnt need to start being dirty like that, the replay clearly showed they werent low blows.

What about the headbutts and clinching from bhop?

If they were low blows then bhop got exactly what he deserved tbh...the amouny of illegal head butts he used and constant holding evened it out.

For heavens sake, hopkins headbutted calzaghe right infront of cortez on one occassion yet nothing was done!

Look, Nard could headbutt Cortez's mother right in front of Joe Cortez but Joe will look the other way.

[Puya]

What a bunch of sore losers

You are acting like B-Hop

JC didn't beat America he beat an American fighter LOL and did the macarena on his ass!!!.

[Pugilistic]

calzaghe did not dominate the fight, i hate when people use the word dominate. dominating a opponent is like lacy- calzaghe, hopkins- trinidad or winky- trinidad. calzaghe i felt lost the fight, he was not the same joe in there, the fight was close but bhop should of gotta the fight. i felt he won.

[LBSCFC]

lets be fair here and tell it how it was. most of the rounds bar the first round were difficult to score. what was plainly obvious was how hopkins would try and stop calzaghe working on the inside. cortez who Im rapidly losing respect for seemed to turn a blind eye to hopkins using his head. at one stage hopkins did it right in front of him and cortez did nothing. hopkins fought the crafty fight we knew he would do trying to counter joe with his right hand. you could argue that the decision could have gone either way. Personally i had calzaghe winning by 2 rounds. Calzaghe was always the fighter that forced the pressure and maybe thats what swayed the fight in his favour in the eyes of 2 of the Vegas judges.