Well, in fairness to the Hopkin'sfans, if you count all those illegal blows in Nard's favor, Nard wins.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Well, in fairness to the Hopkin'sfans, if you count all those illegal blows in Nard's favor, Nard wins.
Hopkins didnt need to start being dirty like that, the replay clearly showed they werent low blows.
What about the headbutts and clinching from bhop?
If they were low blows then bhop got exactly what he deserved tbh...the amouny of illegal head butts he used and constant holding evened it out.
For heavens sake, hopkins headbutted calzaghe right infront of cortez on one occassion yet nothing was done!
Array
What a bunch of sore losers
You are acting like B-Hop
JC didn't beat America he beat an American fighter LOL and did the macarena on his ass!!!.
Last edited by Puya; 04-20-2008 at 09:16 AM.
Que Viva Puerto Rico
Hidden Content
Array
calzaghe did not dominate the fight, i hate when people use the word dominate. dominating a opponent is like lacy- calzaghe, hopkins- trinidad or winky- trinidad. calzaghe i felt lost the fight, he was not the same joe in there, the fight was close but bhop should of gotta the fight. i felt he won.
lets be fair here and tell it how it was. most of the rounds bar the first round were difficult to score. what was plainly obvious was how hopkins would try and stop calzaghe working on the inside. cortez who Im rapidly losing respect for seemed to turn a blind eye to hopkins using his head. at one stage hopkins did it right in front of him and cortez did nothing. hopkins fought the crafty fight we knew he would do trying to counter joe with his right hand. you could argue that the decision could have gone either way. Personally i had calzaghe winning by 2 rounds. Calzaghe was always the fighter that forced the pressure and maybe thats what swayed the fight in his favour in the eyes of 2 of the Vegas judges.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks