Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

[BoxingsEasy]

some of you people have forgotten the tru routes of boxing, "dirty" tactics are apart of the game.

Boxing will never see any beasts in the ring now days its gone to soft.

mma 4tw

[Spicoli]

Giving Hopkins an eternity to rest did not hurt Hopkins. Letting Hopkins hold 90% of the time did not hurt Hopkins. Letting Hopkins lowblow, headbutt and rabbitpunch did not hurt Hopkins. What frigging fight did you see?

Hopkins was allowed to hold 90% of the time .Clean your spec's bro...so That was a phantom make believe Joe Cortez..The same Cortez you were just bitching about...that was staying out of the clinches and NOT breaking them every 8 seconds so no inside game could unfold??Calzaghe GAVE hopkins the oppurtunity to take an advantage by putting himself in that predicament with the low blow...

So it was Cal's fault that Nard acted hurt? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....

[JLAQ]

Couldnt be. Looks like Nard was looking for an opportunity to rest. The punch was borderline, and DEFINITELY higher than lots of punches from Bernard.

The punch was nothing, but Calzaghe gave Hopkins an advantage by straying a punch a bit low and Hopkins capitalized on it.

Capitalize is a positive term, and therefore inappropriate to the sham acting. We don't glorify beyootchery in saddo.

[JLAQ]

some of you people have forgotten the tru routes of boxing, "dirty" tactics are apart of the game.

Boxing will never see any beasts in the ring now days its gone to soft.

mma 4tw

Yeah but the thing is if Nard holds it's ok but if Hatton does it's not. Or if Floyd elbows it's ok but if other's do it's not. A small helping of dirty tactics are OK for as long as there is consistency in rulings.

[JLAQ]

Hopkins was allowed to hold 90% of the time .Clean your spec's bro...so That was a phantom make believe Joe Cortez..The same Cortez you were just bitching about...that was staying out of the clinches and NOT breaking them every 8 seconds so no inside game could unfold??Calzaghe GAVE hopkins the oppurtunity to take an advantage by putting himself in that predicament with the low blow...

So it was Cal's fault that Nard acted hurt? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....

Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.

[rene69]

Couldnt be. Looks like Nard was looking for an opportunity to rest. The punch was borderline, and DEFINITELY higher than lots of punches from Bernard.

The punch was nothing, but Calzaghe gave Hopkins an advantage by straying a punch a bit low and Hopkins capitalized on it.

Capitalize is a positive term, and therefore inappropriate to the sham acting. We don't glorify beyootchery in saddo.

Uh...Hopkins got what he was looking for when Cortez called the time out. So in reality, it was a positive outcome for Hopkins... but that was it.

[JLAQ]

The punch was nothing, but Calzaghe gave Hopkins an advantage by straying a punch a bit low and Hopkins capitalized on it.

Capitalize is a positive term, and therefore inappropriate to the sham acting. We don't glorify beyootchery in saddo.

Uh...Hopkins got what he was looking for when Cortez called the time out. So in reality, it was a positive outcome for Hopkins... but that was it.

Please, let's not get into any semantics here. Kuntery is kuntery. What Hopkins did is a beetch move. Call a spade if you see a spade. It's not different when Chico spit his mouthpiece out.

[Spicoli]

So it was Cal's fault that Nard acted hurt? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....

Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.

Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...

[rene69]

Capitalize is a positive term, and therefore inappropriate to the sham acting. We don't glorify beyootchery in saddo.

Uh...Hopkins got what he was looking for when Cortez called the time out. So in reality, it was a positive outcome for Hopkins... but that was it.

Please, let's not get into any semantics here. Kuntery is kuntery. What Hopkins did is a beetch move. Call a spade if you see a spade. It's not different when Chico spit his mouthpiece out.

And that's what gave Chico the win if memory serves me right. He took advantage of his situation and gave it a positive outcome.

[JLAQ]

There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....

Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.

Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...

Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.

[JLAQ]

Uh...Hopkins got what he was looking for when Cortez called the time out. So in reality, it was a positive outcome for Hopkins... but that was it.

Please, let's not get into any semantics here. Kuntery is kuntery. What Hopkins did is a beetch move. Call a spade if you see a spade. It's not different when Chico spit his mouthpiece out.

And that's what gave Chico the win if memory serves me right. He took advantage of his situation and gave it a positive outcome.

Props to Chico for delivering killer blows, but boos for the mouthpiece.

[Spicoli]

Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.

Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...

Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.

Yeh,I guess Joe just beat another also ran OK type,has yet to garner a win over a great.Its pointless huh hype-man...your obviously invested in your closed mind.Good luck with that

[JLAQ]

Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...

Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.

Yeh,I guess Joe just beat another also ran OK type,has yet to garner a win over a great.Its pointless huh hype-man...your obviously invested in your closed mind.Good luck with that

Joe, beating a good fighter in Hopkins who had a PhD in dirty fighting and the ref in his pocket, makes him a great fighter.

[Spicoli]

Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.

Yeh,I guess Joe just beat another also ran OK type,has yet to garner a win over a great.Its pointless huh hype-man...your obviously invested in your closed mind.Good luck with that

Joe, beating a good fighter in Hopkins who had a PhD in dirty fighting and the ref in his pocket, makes him a great fighter.

I just repped ya...you are a biased narrow mind on this one.Foe s!!! sake Calzaghe won.Does Hopkins owe you child support or something?waste of space

[JLAQ]

Yeh,I guess Joe just beat another also ran OK type,has yet to garner a win over a great.Its pointless huh hype-man...your obviously invested in your closed mind.Good luck with that

Joe, beating a good fighter in Hopkins who had a PhD in dirty fighting and the ref in his pocket, makes him a great fighter.

I just repped ya...you are a biased narrow mind on this one.Foe s!!! sake Calzaghe won.Does Hopkins owe you child support or something?waste of space

I am not so biased as to put a pic of Hopkins in my avatar. Is Hopkins your daddy or something?