Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 38

Thread: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,316
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5157
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post



    Giving Hopkins an eternity to rest did not hurt Hopkins. Letting Hopkins hold 90% of the time did not hurt Hopkins. Letting Hopkins lowblow, headbutt and rabbitpunch did not hurt Hopkins. What frigging fight did you see?
    Hopkins was allowed to hold 90% of the time .Clean your spec's bro...so That was a phantom make believe Joe Cortez..The same Cortez you were just bitching about...that was staying out of the clinches and NOT breaking them every 8 seconds so no inside game could unfold??Calzaghe GAVE hopkins the oppurtunity to take an advantage by putting himself in that predicament with the low blow...
    So it was Cal's fault that Nard acted hurt? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Hopkins was allowed to hold 90% of the time .Clean your spec's bro...so That was a phantom make believe Joe Cortez..The same Cortez you were just bitching about...that was staying out of the clinches and NOT breaking them every 8 seconds so no inside game could unfold??Calzaghe GAVE hopkins the oppurtunity to take an advantage by putting himself in that predicament with the low blow...
    So it was Cal's fault that Nard acted hurt? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....
    Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,316
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5157
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post

    So it was Cal's fault that Nard acted hurt? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
    There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....
    Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.
    Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    There is cause and effect in the ring.Hopkins took advantage of Calzaghes mistake....he gained the upper hand and won the rest of the round.....Its called gamesmen ship and tactics.You dont have to like it!You seem to be obsessed and absorbed with what was mostly Pre fight talking points...News flash..Calzaghe was declared the winner....
    Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.
    Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...
    Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,316
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5157
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post

    Faking, lying, pretending, they're all sheet in my book. As it should be in yours. Boxing is first and foremost, a gentleman's sport.
    Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...
    Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.
    Yeh,I guess Joe just beat another also ran OK type,has yet to garner a win over a great.Its pointless huh hype-man...your obviously invested in your closed mind.Good luck with that

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Boy...you are naive.Was that on the "newbies" pamphlet they past out at the job-fare you went too?The greatest of fighters...and even the not so greats maximize there oppurtunitys given AND taken within the called rules to achive victory.Get over it ...
    Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.
    Yeh,I guess Joe just beat another also ran OK type,has yet to garner a win over a great.Its pointless huh hype-man...your obviously invested in your closed mind.Good luck with that
    Joe, beating a good fighter in Hopkins who had a PhD in dirty fighting and the ref in his pocket, makes him a great fighter.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,316
    Mentioned
    440 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5157
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Without Hopkin's dirty tactics

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post

    Greats maximize their opportunities, but they RARELY prtend things they are not. And they go on to beat their opponents. Thus my conclusion, Hopkins = not great.
    Yeh,I guess Joe just beat another also ran OK type,has yet to garner a win over a great.Its pointless huh hype-man...your obviously invested in your closed mind.Good luck with that
    Joe, beating a good fighter in Hopkins who had a PhD in dirty fighting and the ref in his pocket, makes him a great fighter.
    I just repped ya...you are a biased narrow mind on this one.Foe s!!! sake Calzaghe won.Does Hopkins owe you child support or something?waste of space

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 58
    Last Post: 03-08-2008, 01:33 AM
  2. NEw!! scare tactics for kids show LOL
    By Puya in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-26-2007, 06:36 PM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-21-2007, 10:37 PM
  4. Hattons tactics video
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-14-2006, 01:52 AM
  5. 18 Basic Fighting Tactics
    By IllegalSPKilla in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-24-2005, 05:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing