Quote Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft View Post
I will difinitely doubt him against RJJr and Pavlik.
You have good views normally mate

But like the doubters against lacy, kessler and hopkins...you'll see that calz will be triumphant against both these two.

But fair enough, we all have our opinions.

What matters is that if calzaghe beats jones and pavlik that it totally silcences any doubts and the people who had doubts then come forward and say 'hey, you know what, i had doubts but now i believe joe is the man!'

What if it happens like this? Calz beats jones next, then goes into his final fight against pavlik after beating lacy, kessler, hopkins and jones...will you then still doubt him against pavlik? Just wondering?

When i watch calzaghe fight i see something simmilar to floyd in the way that i see a fighter who can adapt his style, a style that is so difficult to fight against and use it to take out the opponent. By doing this against a very on form hopkins calz showed he has definately got that superior class, he did what a true champ does because he adapted and found the weakness in hopkins (albeit a tiny weakness), he found his range, he found a way to nullify hopkins counter punches by coming in and out and blocking the big straight right (the one that put him on floor in the 1st)...this shows me what ive always thought about calz, that he is the real deal. He went to vegas and proved that he can adapt, he outfoxed the whily fox himself, for thati give him immense credit.