Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    With so much talk about the robberies whether it's people thinking Hopkins got robbed or the Calzaghe fans who say a Hopkins scorecard was out of the question, I thought it would be appropriate to post scorecards so we can see exactly where everyone stands on every round.


    So I'll get things started off. The bolded rounds are the difference in the fight I would think, those are the swing rounds as I see them.

    Hopkins = 1,2,3,4,8,10 = 114

    Calzaghe=5,6,7,9,11,12 = 113 (with the knockdown point deducted)

    I wish someone with a Calzaghe scored this one before I did because I'm sure mine will draw some criticism. The main thing though is how you favor aggressiveness and volume of punches versus Hopkins' one punch at a time style and his circling on the outside.

    Rounds 2,6,7 and 10 were close. I gave 6 and 7 to Calzaghe while I gave the 2 and 10 to Hopkins. I thought the second round Hopkins subdued Joe from the outside and stifled Joe's workrate. Also, no jab from Joe in the second round. In the 10th, Hopkins was winning before he took the rest (which he was allowed to do) and came back to have a couple of his best minutes of the fight. He got a bit of a second wind and came back strong to win the round convincingly imo. However, the acting job he did probably prevented anyone from giving him the round.

    I don't have any problems with someone scoring the fight for Calzaghe, I would have been shocked if they didn't actually because he was the aggressor and aggression wins in Vegas. I don't really agree with that especially since Calzaghe wasn't always effective as the judging criteria requires but that's the way it is.

    I do however have a problem with a 9 rounds to 3 scorecard. That is beyond ridiculous. No way. I would have been fine with anything from 115-112 Calzaghe to 115-112 Hopkins. It was a close fight with a lot of close rounds, not a lot of decisive rounds either way so that accounts for that margin. In the end on my card, I had Hopkins the winner because of that knockdown.
    Amat i had the exact same score completely im glad someone else echo's what i think as well.

  2. #2
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    The judges scorecard:





    Joe Calzaghe dug himself out of an early hole by taking most of the later rounds in his light heavyweight split decision win over fellow legend Bernard Hopkins on Saturday night in Las Vegas. Super Joe took seven of the last eight rounds on the scorecard of judge Ted Gimza (115-112) and nine of the last ten on the card of judge Chuck Giampa (116-111). Judge Adalaide Byrd, who scored the bout 114-113 for Hopkins, awarded Calzaghe four of the last six rounds. The first six rounds of the fight were difficult to score as the judges were fully in agreement on only the 10-8 first round. In the second half, however, five of the six rounds were agreed upon across the board.

    .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    1 Hopkins 10-8
    2 Hopkins 10-9
    3 Hopkins 10-9
    4 Hopkins 10-9
    5 Calzaghe 10-9
    6 Calzaghe 10-9
    7 Hopkins 10-9
    8 Hopkins 10-9
    9 Calzaghe 10-9
    10 Hopkins 10-9
    11 Calzaghe 10-9
    12 Calzaghe 10-9

    115-112 Bernard Hopkins

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1242
    Cool Clicks

    Smile Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    1 Hopkins 10-8
    2 Hopkins 10-9
    3 Hopkins 10-9
    4 Hopkins 10-9
    5 Calzaghe 10-9
    6 Calzaghe 10-9
    7 Hopkins 10-9
    8 Hopkins 10-9
    9 Calzaghe 10-9
    10 Hopkins 10-9
    11 Calzaghe 10-9
    12 Calzaghe 10-9

    115-112 Bernard Hopkins
    I thought pretty similar to this i was sat as the decision came through i never thought Calzaghe had won for one minute then he gets a 116-111 what a joke.Hopkins was the champ in his own backyard i just don't think Calzaghe did enough to win like ICE said the other day Calzaghe should be 43-2 he should have lost to Reid and Hopkins this Hopkins win was a proper gift.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1178
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Good bye B-Hop no more I have to hear form you BYEEEE!!!
    http://a669.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...5bc7041f4c.gif
    Que Viva Puerto Rico
    Hidden Content

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.
    what a stupid comment. bernard never won a round ? he ran he actually did a thing called lateral movement. you need to watch de la hoya - trinidad to see what running actually is. calzaghe was the agressor but landed nothing effective at all while being countered by hopkins effective leads. you can talk about compubox stats but they are completely unrealible.

    Bad rep for you for such a shit and nuthugger post

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1242
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Calzaghe never really landed anything of substance like Hopkins did Calzaghe was the one who was down and the one who was hurt on a few occasions.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3156
    Cool Clicks

    Wink Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Funny old game is scoring.

    All three judges gave the 11th round to Hopkins yet I notice all you Hopkins boys gave it to Calzaghe...
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2462
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Such a hard fight to score. Infact the hardest to score since Hopkins Taylor 1 imo. I think we all agree it was VERY close

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1785
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.



    ... although I'm a hopkins fan... I don't deal in fan-boy bullshit either
    Last edited by PRIDE OF BOSTON; 04-21-2008 at 02:28 PM.
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.
    Look, if people can call the Floyd-Baldomir class a masterclass in boxing 120-108, when all he did was run in a fight officiated by a ref who said Floyd was the greatest, why can't we do the same with Calzaghe, who instead of running like Floyd, chased the bigger fighter in Hopkins, actually HURT Nard (did Floyd hurt Baldo?), all the while being prevented to let it all out by a ref who also thought Nard was the greatest?

    In other words:

    Floyd in Baldo ran for 12 rounds from a feather-fisted journeyman, w/ the ref rooting for him, did not hurt Baldo, gets a wide UD 120-108, while

    Cal in Hop stalked the much bigger and so much more accomplished fighter in Hop (compared to Baldo that is), with the ref against him, hurt Nard at times, but only gets an SD 115-114?

    There is no JUSTICE if that's how you see it.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1294
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.
    Look, if people can call the Floyd-Baldomir class a masterclass in boxing 120-108, when all he did was run in a fight officiated by a ref who said Floyd was the greatest, why can't we do the same with Calzaghe, who instead of running like Floyd, chased the bigger fighter in Hopkins, actually HURT Nard (did Floyd hurt Baldo?), all the while being prevented to let it all out by a ref who also thought Nard was the greatest?

    In other words:

    Floyd in Baldo ran for 12 rounds from a feather-fisted journeyman, w/ the ref rooting for him, did not hurt Baldo, gets a wide UD 120-108, while

    Cal in Hop stalked the much bigger and so much more accomplished fighter in Hop (compared to Baldo that is), with the ref against him, hurt Nard at times, but only gets an SD 115-114?

    There is no JUSTICE if that's how you see it.
    joe did not hurt hopkins. joe followed hopkins round the ring, majority of the time throwing ineffective flurries. rounds that joe won was because hopkins was too inactive. the hopkins that faced trinidad would of beat joe decisively

  14. #14
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.
    Look, if people can call the Floyd-Baldomir class a masterclass in boxing 120-108, when all he did was run in a fight officiated by a ref who said Floyd was the greatest, why can't we do the same with Calzaghe, who instead of running like Floyd, chased the bigger fighter in Hopkins, actually HURT Nard (did Floyd hurt Baldo?), all the while being prevented to let it all out by a ref who also thought Nard was the greatest?

    In other words:

    Floyd in Baldo ran for 12 rounds from a feather-fisted journeyman, w/ the ref rooting for him, did not hurt Baldo, gets a wide UD 120-108, while

    Cal in Hop stalked the much bigger and so much more accomplished fighter in Hop (compared to Baldo that is), with the ref against him, hurt Nard at times, but only gets an SD 115-114?

    There is no JUSTICE if that's how you see it.
    Thats ridiculous comparison you really are a hater aren't you ?? the difference is Baldomir didn't land any solid shots on Mayweather in the entire fight he was dominated thats pretty obvious to see, where as Hopkins dropped Calzaghe, and he also landed the much more effective cleaner blows.

    THATS WHY EVERYONE SCORED MAYWEATHER VS BALDOMIR 120-108, AND THATS WHY EVERYONE HAS HOPKINS VS CALZAGHE A CLOSE FIGHT, AND YOUR THE ONLY MORON WHO HAS IT THAT WIDE.

    Hope that helps.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post


    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.
    Look, if people can call the Floyd-Baldomir class a masterclass in boxing 120-108, when all he did was run in a fight officiated by a ref who said Floyd was the greatest, why can't we do the same with Calzaghe, who instead of running like Floyd, chased the bigger fighter in Hopkins, actually HURT Nard (did Floyd hurt Baldo?), all the while being prevented to let it all out by a ref who also thought Nard was the greatest?

    In other words:

    Floyd in Baldo ran for 12 rounds from a feather-fisted journeyman, w/ the ref rooting for him, did not hurt Baldo, gets a wide UD 120-108, while

    Cal in Hop stalked the much bigger and so much more accomplished fighter in Hop (compared to Baldo that is), with the ref against him, hurt Nard at times, but only gets an SD 115-114?

    There is no JUSTICE if that's how you see it.
    Thats ridiculous comparison you really are a hater aren't you ?? the difference is Baldomir didn't land any solid shots on Mayweather in the entire fight he was dominated thats pretty obvious to see, where as Hopkins dropped Calzaghe, and he also landed the much more effective cleaner blows.

    THATS WHY EVERYONE SCORED MAYWEATHER VS BALDOMIR 120-108, AND THATS WHY EVERYONE HAS HOPKINS VS CALZAGHE A CLOSE FIGHT, AND YOUR THE ONLY MORON WHO HAS IT THAT WIDE.

    Hope that helps.
    LOL and Floyd landed solid shots? You of all people, who said that Cal didnt land any on Nard, will now say that Floyd landed solid shots on Baldomir? Jesus Christ.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who do you think will win, Hopkins or Calzaghe?
    By XaduBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-20-2008, 04:05 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-09-2008, 02:43 AM
  3. HOPKINS VS CALZAGHE?
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-18-2008, 02:40 PM
  4. Hopkins v Calzaghe.... Hopkins speaks
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-20-2006, 04:47 AM
  5. Hopkins Calzaghe anyone?
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-13-2006, 04:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing