Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    The judges scorecard:





    Joe Calzaghe dug himself out of an early hole by taking most of the later rounds in his light heavyweight split decision win over fellow legend Bernard Hopkins on Saturday night in Las Vegas. Super Joe took seven of the last eight rounds on the scorecard of judge Ted Gimza (115-112) and nine of the last ten on the card of judge Chuck Giampa (116-111). Judge Adalaide Byrd, who scored the bout 114-113 for Hopkins, awarded Calzaghe four of the last six rounds. The first six rounds of the fight were difficult to score as the judges were fully in agreement on only the 10-8 first round. In the second half, however, five of the six rounds were agreed upon across the board.

    .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    1 Hopkins 10-8
    2 Hopkins 10-9
    3 Hopkins 10-9
    4 Hopkins 10-9
    5 Calzaghe 10-9
    6 Calzaghe 10-9
    7 Hopkins 10-9
    8 Hopkins 10-9
    9 Calzaghe 10-9
    10 Hopkins 10-9
    11 Calzaghe 10-9
    12 Calzaghe 10-9

    115-112 Bernard Hopkins

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1233
    Cool Clicks

    Smile Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    1 Hopkins 10-8
    2 Hopkins 10-9
    3 Hopkins 10-9
    4 Hopkins 10-9
    5 Calzaghe 10-9
    6 Calzaghe 10-9
    7 Hopkins 10-9
    8 Hopkins 10-9
    9 Calzaghe 10-9
    10 Hopkins 10-9
    11 Calzaghe 10-9
    12 Calzaghe 10-9

    115-112 Bernard Hopkins
    I thought pretty similar to this i was sat as the decision came through i never thought Calzaghe had won for one minute then he gets a 116-111 what a joke.Hopkins was the champ in his own backyard i just don't think Calzaghe did enough to win like ICE said the other day Calzaghe should be 43-2 he should have lost to Reid and Hopkins this Hopkins win was a proper gift.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1168
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Good bye B-Hop no more I have to hear form you BYEEEE!!!
    http://a669.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...5bc7041f4c.gif
    Que Viva Puerto Rico
    Hidden Content

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1285
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.
    what a stupid comment. bernard never won a round ? he ran he actually did a thing called lateral movement. you need to watch de la hoya - trinidad to see what running actually is. calzaghe was the agressor but landed nothing effective at all while being countered by hopkins effective leads. you can talk about compubox stats but they are completely unrealible.

    Bad rep for you for such a shit and nuthugger post

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    in a house
    Posts
    4,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1233
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Calzaghe never really landed anything of substance like Hopkins did Calzaghe was the one who was down and the one who was hurt on a few occasions.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3147
    Cool Clicks

    Wink Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Funny old game is scoring.

    All three judges gave the 11th round to Hopkins yet I notice all you Hopkins boys gave it to Calzaghe...
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Essex Mafia
    Posts
    14,712
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2453
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Such a hard fight to score. Infact the hardest to score since Hopkins Taylor 1 imo. I think we all agree it was VERY close

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    3,880
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1552
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    I think I scored it 115-112 to Calzaghe.

    Cant find my score card.


    Hopkins used every dirty trick in the book and he still got beat.

    The ref should have warned Hopkins for his constant holding and taken a point if it continued.

    THE BEST MAN WON.
    Balls

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2193
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    I'm not getting into the arguements of scoring.. Some of the rounds could have gone either way.. The first knockdown was definetly a knockdown, but certainly had no effect on Calzaghe being hurt.. It was a nice punch that had Calzaghe's feet squared up and obviously not balanced, and then Hopkins pushing forward to make sure Calzaghe went onto his ass..

    No my stream was pretty crappy, but the other times I saw a punch get Calzaghe wobbling, it was a punch that had shortly followed a head clash.. So it could be argued that it was the butts that had Calzaghe almost out a few times... I don't think Calzaghe would have gone down in the first from the punch, if Hopkins did not continue to come forward and push him off balance..

    100% agree though that Hopkins landed the better punches.. By far.. And did not run.. He was tactical. If he stood and traded with Joe, it would have been Joe's fight..

    Everyone someone chooses as part of their gameplan NOT to stand their and go blow for blow with their opponent,,,, someone will accuse them of running..
    Boxing is a game of tactics, as much as it is a game of punching.. Hopkins is one of boxings best tacticians, and gave Joe one hell of a run for his money...
    Jlaq, i'll give you the benifit of this one, as you may be a hard core Joe fan and can only see this fight through one eye... But come some newer fights, I hope your fight analysis extends past just the guy you support...
    Hopkins performed better than any of Joe's previous opponents.. And if they fought 10 times, I have no doubt he could win at least half of those...

    I don't argue with the Joe win which is already going against a lot of people, but calzaghe 120-108 is just showing a lack of respect for proper judgment of a bout.

  12. #12
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Such a hard fight to score. Infact the hardest to score since Hopkins Taylor 1 imo. I think we all agree it was VERY close
    I don't think Taylor vs Hopkins 1 was that hard to score, Taylor pretty much clearly won most of the early rounds, with Hopkins at best winning 2 rounds out of the first 8 with 1 even round. Then Hopkins clearly won the last 4 rounds.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1776
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.



    ... although I'm a hopkins fan... I don't deal in fan-boy bullshit either
    Last edited by PRIDE OF BOSTON; 04-21-2008 at 02:28 PM.
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.
    Look, if people can call the Floyd-Baldomir class a masterclass in boxing 120-108, when all he did was run in a fight officiated by a ref who said Floyd was the greatest, why can't we do the same with Calzaghe, who instead of running like Floyd, chased the bigger fighter in Hopkins, actually HURT Nard (did Floyd hurt Baldo?), all the while being prevented to let it all out by a ref who also thought Nard was the greatest?

    In other words:

    Floyd in Baldo ran for 12 rounds from a feather-fisted journeyman, w/ the ref rooting for him, did not hurt Baldo, gets a wide UD 120-108, while

    Cal in Hop stalked the much bigger and so much more accomplished fighter in Hop (compared to Baldo that is), with the ref against him, hurt Nard at times, but only gets an SD 115-114?

    There is no JUSTICE if that's how you see it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1285
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Your Calzaghe-Hopkins Scorecard

    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by PRIDE OF BOSTON View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JLAQ View Post
    120-108 Calzaghe, if not for the KD. Nard never won a round. He ran all night. Calzaghe, the aggressor, chased him like some dirty ex-con, bitch-slapped Nard like crazy, all the while being restrained by the biased referee. It was a masterclass in boxing. Grace under pressure.

    You're getting slapped down with -27 REP for your comment. This is a forum and you're allowed your oppinion but this is rediculous... You do know this is a boxing forum, no?

    The people that post here make intelligent comments that can be backed with fact... Not mindless drivle.

    I've seen one post from you on this forum and it was idiotic... Hopkins didn't win a round? If you ever want some help on how to score a fight in regards to ring generalship, active agression and landing harder, cleaner shots let me know...

    Clearly you need some help.

    I love BHop but still scored the fight with Calzaghe winning by 1 pt.

    Although I wanted Joe to lose I'm glad he got a fair decision here. I hate hometown bullshit.
    Look, if people can call the Floyd-Baldomir class a masterclass in boxing 120-108, when all he did was run in a fight officiated by a ref who said Floyd was the greatest, why can't we do the same with Calzaghe, who instead of running like Floyd, chased the bigger fighter in Hopkins, actually HURT Nard (did Floyd hurt Baldo?), all the while being prevented to let it all out by a ref who also thought Nard was the greatest?

    In other words:

    Floyd in Baldo ran for 12 rounds from a feather-fisted journeyman, w/ the ref rooting for him, did not hurt Baldo, gets a wide UD 120-108, while

    Cal in Hop stalked the much bigger and so much more accomplished fighter in Hop (compared to Baldo that is), with the ref against him, hurt Nard at times, but only gets an SD 115-114?

    There is no JUSTICE if that's how you see it.
    joe did not hurt hopkins. joe followed hopkins round the ring, majority of the time throwing ineffective flurries. rounds that joe won was because hopkins was too inactive. the hopkins that faced trinidad would of beat joe decisively

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Who do you think will win, Hopkins or Calzaghe?
    By XaduBoxer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 04-20-2008, 04:05 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-09-2008, 02:43 AM
  3. HOPKINS VS CALZAGHE?
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-18-2008, 02:40 PM
  4. Hopkins v Calzaghe.... Hopkins speaks
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-20-2006, 04:47 AM
  5. Hopkins Calzaghe anyone?
    By Kev in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-13-2006, 04:26 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing