Re: Question for the biblical religious

Originally Posted by
luvfightgame

Originally Posted by
Dark Lord Al
I think i had better leave this debate before i offend any of you believers

(which i dont intend to do as you are entitled to your opinions )
No offense taken. I was arguing evolution stand alone. Not as compared to another faith. That's when you see the holes in the theory. If you compare it to something else, it makes sense. If you try to stand it up on it's own, it won't do it.
The fact remains.....
A male and female of a species both had to evolve at the same time with a reproductive system in place and a method to feed the offspring, and themselves. And the food system had to evolve also and reproducing enough to feed the other thing long enough. There is no stand alone life form. It's all interdependent which makes evolution that much harder to believe.
You are entitled to your opinion as well, just don't call it a fact when it's an opinion, and not at all settled fact.
Excellent observation. The theory has some fatal loopholes that leaves it still just a theory after more than a century. One of its flaws is that it is anchored solely on the process of natural selection that must favor the most successful or prolific breeders; no other criteria are allowed. It fails to explain why we have eyebrows, which I discussed earlier. Definitely, the eyebrows, which protect our eyes from irritating sweats, has nothing to do with our ability to reproduce and continue our progeny. So why was it put there, for our convenience? Of course scientists will never accept that. I'm pretty sure there are other parts of our body that perform some useful functions in our life but have nothing to do with our ability to reproduce. So why are they there or why were they evolved?
Once in awhile, get outside in fresh air, take a deep breath & with a deep sigh, let out all the things that's bottled up inside you & be free, & you'll get a glimpse of nirvana.
Bookmarks