Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: IF CALZAGHE LOST, WHY??? (That's for anyone who believes Joe to have lost that is)

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    29
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: IF CALZAGHE LOST, WHY??? (That's for anyone who believes Joe to have lost that is

    Quote Originally Posted by yu1412 View Post
    This sums it up for me niceley


    Calzaghe gets nod; Hopkins get stiffed[IMG]file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/owner/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/msohtml1/01/clip_image001.gif[/IMG]By David Douse (April 22, 200 Doghouse Boxing (Photo © German Villasenor)


    Despite dropping Joe Calzaghe with a short right hand in the first round, consistently landing the harder cleaner punches throughout the fight, and in this writer’s opinion clearly dominating the style in which the battle would be fought, Bernard Hopkins came away from this much anticipated battle on the short end of a split decision.

    How did this come to be? Obviously enough, two out of the three judges were sufficiently impressed by Calzaghe throwing leather at every opportunity but I have to wonder whether they were taken in by
    the massive pre-fight hype pertaining to the Welshman's alleged ability to throw a thousand punches a round and thus became a confused over what actually constitutes proper scoring shots. It is certainly true that Calzaghe let his hands go rather more than B-Hop, but I would strongly question the quality of Calzaghe's efforts and seriously dispute that he should be credited with landing point scoring punches when the bulk of his efforts were so often nothing but ineffectual slaps.

    Even the judge who scored in favour of Hopkins also had it wrong in my view and personally I felt that Hopkins came away with what should have been scored as a three round margin in his favour, especially when his first round knockdown of Calzaghe is taken into account. On no occasion did Calzaghe manage to land any strong punches which had any discernible effect on the older man, whereas Hopkins’ own thudding shots clearly gave the Pride of Wales something to think about on several occasions other than the knockdown.
    I have seen criticism online of Hopkins for taking the permitted breather when he was struck low and, although the first low blow from Calzaghe was not of the worst kind (it was also clearly unintentional), it was clearly well south of the border. Hopkins was well within his rights to avail himself of the recovery period and criticising him for this makes no sense and is just plain wrong. I am convinced that those who would sneer at B-Hop for taking time to draw breath would have been absolutely screaming in outrage had it been Hopkins who had committed the foul.

    Perhaps mention should also be made here of Calzaghe's crass follow-up whilst standing behind the bent over Hopkins with his jiggling hip thrusting movements clearly simulating a sex act in the most disrespectful and ugly manner and which was, to say the least, hardly what one would expect from a man who has touted himself as a ' Mr Clean’. I cannot feel that Calzaghe has in any way enhanced his reputation by this ugly display and it may be that he does not realise that it was actually himself he was demeaning by his actions.

    So what now for Bernard Hopkins? I would think it highly unlikely that Calzaghe would want any part of a rematch and Hopkins probably has little to prove to himself, so I should not be at all surprised if he chose this moment to finally hang up the gloves. Regardless of his decision his legacy is assured and while he might prefer to exit on a winning note, being stiffed on a decision like this won't be the end of the world to him. He has been around far too long to not understand that wrong decisions do come to pass, and that hype in favour of one particular fighter can give a clear perceptual advantage to the recipient when it comes to decisions.
    Pretty much how I saw it.

    Hopkins slips punch= Calzaghe landed a clean left hand! Total bullshit, but that's how it go's. They will rob that man forever. It's all about the money. Calzaghe V.S. Jones for only a small price of 49.99!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1150
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: IF CALZAGHE LOST, WHY??? (That's for anyone who believes Joe to have lost that is

    Sorry. You just can not compare Mayweather/ Baldomir to the Calzaghe/ Hopkins fight. Mayweather was clearly outlanding Baldomir and I think everybody on the planet scored it for Mayweather.

    The Calzaghe/ Hopkins fight has caused debate as to who won. Personally I thought it was close and you have an argument for either fighter depending how you scored the fight. I did not score the fight but my impression and opinion was that Calzaghe had nicked it. I think its fantasy to say Hopkins lost 9 rounds though. 116 - 111. (Just wrong)

    If you liked the clean, harder shots landing, controlling the tempo of the fight then you would say Hopkins. If you go for being the agressor, trying to make the fight, throwing more shots, landing more shots, regardless of how powerful they are then you would go with Calzaghe.
    Tip of the month: Protect yourselves at all times. You never know when the scheming bitch will come back for more.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. has calzaghe lost his power?
    By ryanman in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 04-10-2007, 01:11 AM
  2. Lost
    By Preme in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2007, 05:00 PM
  3. Tyson's Lost 3 Years vs. Ali's Lost 3 Years
    By clean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 12-29-2006, 10:46 AM
  4. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-22-2006, 07:09 PM
  5. ZAB JUDAH LOST, NO MATTER WHAT THE NSAC SAYS, HE STILL LOST
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-11-2006, 11:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing