Calzaghe best P4P ??

**:::PSL:::** · 05-09-2008 05:04 PM

Boxing: Ratings

I can live with it.

.

**gudnite vienna** · 05-09-2008 05:07 PM

cant argue with that really.. can see Haye comming into the fold when he Knocks out Wlad and co

**jmbtandy** · 05-09-2008 05:12 PM

yeah would love to see Haye in the mix, his chin worries me but he has all the makings of a super star

**porkypara** · 05-09-2008 05:51 PM

I would have Mayweather #1 and its close for Calazaghe or Pac-Man for 2 and 3rd spot.

**Beanflicker** · 05-09-2008 06:01 PM

In my eyes, Calzaghe is #3 behind PBF and Pac. I DO NOT agree with rating Marquez above Calzaghe, expecially considering he is coming off A LOSS (no matter if it was controversial).

**p4pking** · 05-09-2008 08:50 PM

Originally Posted by Beanflicker

In my eyes, Calzaghe is #3 behind PBF and Pac. I DO NOT agree with rating Marquez above Calzaghe, expecially considering he is coming off A LOSS (no matter if it was controversial).

Yes, but that is exactly the point. I have Marquez top 3, becuase IN MY EYES he beat Pacquiao. He could have easily gotten the decision, and had he done so, he would probably be most everyone's number 2. What does how the judges saw the fight have to do with where he really stands? Why should it change where I consider him to be among the best, because the judges saw the fight differently than I did?. It's all someone's opinion anyways, I just feel he's a slightly better fighter than Calzaghe. IMO, the worst part about questionable judging these days is not even that it takes place, but that so many people are still willing to accept the judges decision as gospel. I'm not saying Marquez Pac was a bad decision either, but it certainly wasn'ta fight that Pacquiao clearly won, so why is he clearly ahead of Marquez p4p? Why is it out of the question to have Marquez top 3 p4p simply because he lost on paper? Being a p4p fighter isn't like having a belt, because the judges can't take your ability away from you.