Despite all that is wrong with the WBA, I find it weird that people think they've only just descended into madness. They instituted the Super Champion-thing a few years ago (if I remember correctly on request by Lennox Lewis). Hell, even Sven Ottke was a WBA Super Champ!

Also, it should be said that the point of that rule (besides making more money for the WBA) is to make it easier for champs to unify. That should be applauded, shouldnt it?

Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
1) The Ring - Most definitive

2) WBC - Most ties to the Ring

3) IBF - Least corruption

4a) WBO - Just another title

4b) WBA - Just another title

I consider all other titles to be minor league titles.
I agree with this one - although I might put WBA as 3b) with IBF 3a). After all the WBA does have a (significantly) greater legacy than WBO.