Quote Originally Posted by Starr
It doesn't equate for the past. But for most people its recent.

See I agree with you.

But Mayweather beats Gatti its

cmon who really thought Gatti would win .

Mayweather beats Judah its

Judah lost to Baldomir.

And you said every fighter has an off night and I could say that same thing about Judah against Baldomir but then it would be taking away from Carlos' accomplishment.

Fact is, Floyd beat a focused Judah and he did it the right way.

But like I said, to the average boxing fan who saw Judah get beaten by Baldomir they aren't going to give props.


Contrast that to the average boxing fan watching Mitchell on the comeback, tszyu destroy him, then Hatton beat Tszyu.

Then watch Maussa beat Vivian Harris, and then see Hatton knock out Maussa.

Thats why the lately and people hold it higher. And yes it is a problem.
Agreed...all I am getting at is that it's a shame that it's that way because in the end...people take away from Floyd...but they don't take away from Hatton.

It's been swept under the rug lately that Hatton has only beaten 3 game names...or what I consider to be game...but the Kostya & laughabley the Maussa win are the cream of the crop.

Yet...everyone brushes off Mayweather's anniahalations & humiliations of some of todays better fighters & greater names. Everyone today makes bullshat excuses for why Floyd won...not that Floyd outclassed them...but that they were weight drained & what not or that they had a handful of good rounds so that means that the judges were on Floyd's side.

It's bullshat. We as boxing fans should know better.

I can sit back & say Hatton looked good against Tackie, Kostya, & Maussa & feel fine about it...but I can also sit back & say that Mayweather dominated everyone EVERYONE that he faced...even Castillo, Corley, & Judah.

That doesn't make me better than everyone else or any shat like that...I just think that people need to recognize past before they try to comdemn with the present & even the future.

I christmas...I'm sauced again.