Floyd has the best resume simply because he has no losses. As far as competiton, or big names, Holy, BHOP, and Oscar, as well as Winky or Roy have all fought alot of top guys, maybe more than Floyd, but, Floyd hasn't lost yet. I guess it's really how you judge a "resume". If it's just on competition, would a fighter that fought the top 10, but lost 6 of those be considered better than a fighter that fought a mixed half of the top 30 and won em all? Oscar and Holyfield have fought the absolute best of their era, all credit due regardless.


Have to add about the Gatti statement that he was already shot when he fought Floyd, IMO, Gatti after Ward part 1, was the best he'd ever been, although that's not saying a whole lot.