The barrera-Morales trilogy

**the wiz** · 06-11-2008 09:57 PM

It didn't get better than these. I had Morales winning 1 & 2. Barerra in the 3rd. Does anyone else think Morales should of scored a knockdown in the 2nd fight? I forget the round

**OumaFan** · 06-11-2008 10:25 PM

I thought Barrera won the first, Morales the second, and Barrera the third. They were all close but I've seen them all a fair amount and I've never changed my mind about the winner of each fight.

**Galaxy** · 06-11-2008 10:33 PM

For me the Vasquez/ Marquez trilogy is better than the Barrera/ Morales trilogy. The second Barrera/ Morales fight is the one that doesn't stand up against the others.

In saying that Barrera/ Morales 1 is my favorite of all 6 fights

**Kirkland Laing** · 06-11-2008 10:37 PM

I had it Barrera, Morales, Barrera. I was at the first fight and it's still the last fight I've been to live. Watching at the time I thought it was the best fight I'd ever seen and having watched it on TV since I have to agree with myself.

**TyBuff** · 06-11-2008 10:49 PM

I had it MAB, Morales, MAB. In the first fight MAB just took it to Morales and out fought him. The second Morales outboxed MAB for the first 6 before MAB dragged him into a slugfest. The third I felt MAB was in control most of the fight.

I dont think you can top this trilogy. Marq/Vasquez is good but to me it just doesnt measure up to MAB/Morales.

**Fenster** · 06-11-2008 10:52 PM

Barrera deserved to win the first fight. He made it.

It seems crazy now to think Barrera was written off as semi-finished at the time.. and was a ridiculous underdog with the bookies.

And the worse thing is - they each got around $100,000 for that fight