Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 37

Thread: Define a "Duck"

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    247
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Define a "Duck"

    Quote Originally Posted by Thread Stealer View Post
    It's hard to clarify exactly what a "duck" is because there's a lot of things behind closed doors that go on.

    For example, Roberto Duran got stripped of his WBA belt at 154 for not facing his mandatory in Mike McCallum. Instead, he fought the more established, WBC champ in Thomas Hearns for more money. A duck? I think not.

    Duran was supposed to fight Carlos Ortiz in a non-title bout at MSG, but his management (Carlos Eleta) told him no and pulled out, saying Duran was sick. Eleta also didn't want Duran to have a rematch with Ken Buchanan, or fight Antonio Cervantes at 140. Are these considered "ducks"? Buchanan later said something like "Duran would fight anyone but his management made the decisions".

    Or what about Floyd Mayweather and Kostya Tszyu? Is Mayweather re-signing with HBO, the more powerful and lucrative network, considered a "duck"? Exclusive HBO and Showtime fighters don't fight each other unless it's something like Lennox Lewis-Mike Tyson which generates $100 million in PPV revenue.

    People always talk about Ray Leonard "ducking" Aaron Pryor because they watched Legendary Nights. Pryor "called out" Leonard at a press conference, but all the big names are going to get challenged. Fighters want to fight the big names. Does a welterweight champ have an obligation to fight a champ in a lower weight class, when the other champ hasn't done anything at welter?

    What exactly is a fair definition/explanation of a "duck"?
    Great Topic.

    A "Duck" in the traditional sense is often misused. You made some great examples on how they are often misused. Especially with the McCallum/Hearns fight examples. Those are not Ducks. There were legit purses of signifigant amounts to be gained. Also the McCallum fight is one that could have been made right after the Hearns bout. that was more or less putting something on the back burner.

    A good example of a Duck is Jack Dempsey and Sam Langford.

    The bout between Jack Dempsey and Sam Langford was proposed dozens of times. Jack used to use the Race card as an excuse then just totally change the subject. Even if asked "Would you fight him if he was white"

    Years later Dempsey admitted in his biography that color had nothing to do with it. he was flat out scared to fight him.

    If a fighter has the opportunity to face one of three champions and he picks the weakest link I consider that a duck. If a champion has the chance to unify but decides to fight a guy ranked 25th in the organization he represents I consider that a duck.

    If a champion would rather have his title stripped then face a certain opponent that is a mandatory I consider that a duck.

    I do not think all ducks have to do with a fighter being "Scared" of another fighter as some perople think. At times it has to do with money. Why fight one guy when the other is worth 3 million more.

    Roy Jones "Ducked" Joe Calzaghe when he was LHW champion and all the offers where being made. Roy himself said it not too long ago during a fight telecast (I think it was during the Hopkins/Calzaghe bout).

    Jones stated he would like to fight the winner of the bout. If it was Calzaghe he would even be willing to go to the UK.The other announcer asked why did he not fight Calzaghe years ago when the fight was being proposed and he was champion. His reply.

    "They wanted the fight in the UK and I had too much to lose then"

    Jones was not scared of Calzaghe but he was not risking things either.

    Dozens of fighters have been ducked and will continue to be ducked. Sometimes it is for money, sometimes it is just because a guy does not want to risk it, why go through 1 war and risk a loss when you can go through 3 minor altercations that you will come out unscathed with the same benifits.

    Of course the promotion teram has a lot to do with who fights who so you can not always blame the fighter.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1410
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Define a "Duck"

    It floats on water and quacks.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-29-2010, 05:30 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2007, 09:27 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 02:55 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-04-2006, 06:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing