He's not more fundamentally sound. Collazo has better technique than him, don't let Collazo's performance against Mosley deter you. I still think COllazo had a very good chance of beating Mosley had he not hurt his left hand, I mean after that he didn't throw anything, but judging by him against Hatton, he has great stamina, reflexes, and technique. Quintana is more likely to fold under pressure, he doesn't have great durability, he is slower, and yes he hits harder which I think Berto needs is a guy who's power he needs to respect.
Did you see ever see Collazo winning the belt against Rivera? He's definitely not a guy who deals with pressure all that well it's just that Hatton provided nothing but dumb aggression their fight.
Quintana neutralizes pressure a lot better then Collazo and he's not just a counterpuncher like he was against Williams, he can put together an attack moving forward a lot better then Collazo and most other welterweight contenders which is the big question for me.
Im watching it right now and Berto just threw 5 hooks in a row. This is the first time ive seen him fight, and im impressed to say the least.
LOL, he finished him while i was typing this.
He looks like hes gonna be good.
Quintana didn't neutralize Cotto very well at all. I think his style suits Berto better at this point. Berto isn't a pure pressure fighter, like Cotto, he is more of a boxer-puncher than a pure pressure fighter, which is why you see him backed up without him really caring, and you see him fight using his speed to land while remaining far enough away to not get hit at distance himself.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks