Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

**Fenster** · 06-26-2008 11:43 PM

Guzman don't carry no weight to the negotiation table. That's why he can be AVOIDED by the "stars".. and why he got his title robbed off him messing about trying to defend in Scotland.

Like Ice.. I too would back Guzman all day long to beat Pac. Fact.

**CutMeMick** · 07-23-2008 08:20 PM

**amat** · 07-23-2008 08:29 PM

Brucelee never even posted in this thread

**miron_lang** · 07-24-2008 05:57 AM

Guzman could and would. His best wins were against a gatekeeper(Barrios) and a contender (Sotto)

Guzman is a great fighter by potential not by accomplishment.

beat Campbell (Impressively)and have a better chance of landing pac.

**antimoron** · 07-24-2008 02:06 PM

A chess match like battle. I think a seasoned fighter like campbell can pull it off. I don't discredit guzmans skill and talent but he never fought A-class type fighter above 122 division thats why he looks good on those fights. wonder if he fought the marquez, barreras, morales or pacs in the 126 or 130. and keep in mind 0 KO since leaving 122. If campbell can deal juan diaz power i think he can deal guzmans as well. and i don't think juan diaz is less talented than guzman. Guzman speed is good but he is no PBF. He barely beat Sotto in his last fight. Again talk is cheap in boxing. Another "ifs" and "buts"... Lets just wait the result and we'll see who fights next who.