Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Lamont Peterson

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1681
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Been following both brothers for a while now. About time they stepped it up tho, they have been thereabouts for a couple of years now. As a few others have said they have good skills but maybe not the power and ring smarts to make it big.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Twenty four fights and he's fighting somebody with thirteen defeats. And they say British fighters are over-protected.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1681
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Twenty four fights and he's fighting somebody with thirteen defeats. And they say British fighters are over-protected.
    Difference is if he was British he'd be a WBO champ by now

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Twenty four fights and he's fighting somebody with thirteen defeats. And they say British fighters are over-protected.
    Difference is if he was British he'd be a WBO champ by now
    I can't see him beating either of the guys who fought for the WBO title on Saturday night.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    I'm also huge on the Petersons.

    It is time they step up but to be fair Rogelio is a good fighter. Local guy but very tough. I can't complain about them being brought up like they are, I think promoters are finding out more and more that the 4 year plan for top Olympians/Amateurs is too risky and not worth it. They have matched him with an abundance of different styles which is key unlike Khan who got matched up solely against complete powder puffs with 0 KO power until his last go. Mixing and matching against lower competition is definitely worth it. That's what they did with Pavlik and he got to the top ranks having already seen pretty much everything thrown at him just a few skill levels below championship level. That's what they are doing with Andre Ward and now what they are doing with the Petersons.

    I haven't seen the fight last night but really want to. From some comments on here it seems that they think the brothers put it on cruise control a bit to often. Very similar to the main criticism of Andre Ward but obviously I don't mind that.

    I hope to see the fight tomorrow.

    Also, before the fight Arum told Lamont that he is next in line to fight the winner of Holt-Torres. Obviously the controversial nature of the fight might delay that but I think those are two winnable fights for him. Especially against Holt. Torres would no doubt check Peterson's chin but going all the way back to his amateur days he's always had a good chin but then again no one in his amateur days hit as hard as Torres.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1681
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Twenty four fights and he's fighting somebody with thirteen defeats. And they say British fighters are over-protected.
    Difference is if he was British he'd be a WBO champ by now
    I can't see him beating either of the guys who fought for the WBO title on Saturday night.
    The point is Peterson hasnt even got a title shot yet, but guys like Froch, Rees, Lockett etc get shots at titles doing just as little as Lamont. Dot act as tho US fighters are protected more than British fighters just cos one US fighter has had an easy run.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1997
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post

    Difference is if he was British he'd be a WBO champ by now
    I can't see him beating either of the guys who fought for the WBO title on Saturday night.
    The point is Peterson hasnt even got a title shot yet, but guys like Froch, Rees, Lockett etc get shots at titles doing just as little as Lamont. Dot act as tho US fighters are protected more than British fighters just cos one US fighter has had an easy run.
    I didn't say they were. I'm pleased to see that we both agree that there are cases of US fighters being over-protected.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1681
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by eagle View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post

    I can't see him beating either of the guys who fought for the WBO title on Saturday night.
    The point is Peterson hasnt even got a title shot yet, but guys like Froch, Rees, Lockett etc get shots at titles doing just as little as Lamont. Dot act as tho US fighters are protected more than British fighters just cos one US fighter has had an easy run.
    I didn't say they were. I'm pleased to see that we both agree that there are cases of US fighters being over-protected.
    No doubt there are cases, but British fighters are far more protected in general.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2905
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Lamont Peterson

    Not to mention your average 13 loss American fighter based on the West Coast is far better then your average 13 loss British fighter.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. ThurNF - Anthony Peterson & Vanes Martirosyan!!!
    By CutMeMick in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 06-28-2008, 03:07 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-24-2007, 07:09 AM
  3. Lamont Peterson on Zab/Vazquez undercard
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-07-2007, 08:09 PM
  4. your thoughts on the peterson brothers
    By oldirtycasper in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-10-2007, 08:47 PM
  5. Lamont Peterson-Amir khan
    By Tam Seddon in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-07-2006, 01:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing