Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: From ESPN: Hoya vs. PAC in the works

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: From ESPN: Hoya vs. PAC in the works

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    WTF? De La Hoya is much the bigger man, and has actually fought (though not very successfully) at middleweight.

    Might as well throw a tent over the ring and have clowns for ring girls. 'Cause that's all it would be..... a damn circus.
    PAC is an option now for Hoya since Tito won't go down to 154.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,867
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2049
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: From ESPN: Hoya vs. PAC in the works

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    WTF? De La Hoya is much the bigger man, and has actually fought (though not very successfully) at middleweight.

    Might as well throw a tent over the ring and have clowns for ring girls. 'Cause that's all it would be..... a damn circus.
    PAC is an option now for Hoya since Tito won't go down to 154.
    Why should Tito go down to 154? They both fought at 160. And years have a way of making getting down to a certain weight that much harder. I say hold the fight at 160. But going down to meet Pac? That's just a bit much of a stretch to me.

  3. #3
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: From ESPN: Hoya vs. PAC in the works

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    WTF? De La Hoya is much the bigger man, and has actually fought (though not very successfully) at middleweight.

    Might as well throw a tent over the ring and have clowns for ring girls. 'Cause that's all it would be..... a damn circus.
    PAC is an option now for Hoya since Tito won't go down to 154.
    Why should Tito go down to 154? They both fought at 160. And years have a way of making getting down to a certain weight that much harder. I say hold the fight at 160. But going down to meet Pac? That's just a bit much of a stretch to me.
    I guess Team Hoya offered Tito a fight at 154 but Team Tito said "no" or "can't". If Hoya will go down to 147 to fight PAC then Hoya considered PAC as a valuable opponent that he's willing to make concessions.

    If Hoya will fight Cotto, what weight do you think they will fight? 147 or 154 or a catchweight?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,867
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2049
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: From ESPN: Hoya vs. PAC in the works

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post

    PAC is an option now for Hoya since Tito won't go down to 154.
    Why should Tito go down to 154? They both fought at 160. And years have a way of making getting down to a certain weight that much harder. I say hold the fight at 160. But going down to meet Pac? That's just a bit much of a stretch to me.
    I guess Team Hoya offered Tito a fight at 154 but Team Tito said "no" or "can't". If Hoya will go down to 147 to fight PAC then Hoya considered PAC as a valuable opponent that he's willing to make concessions.

    If Hoya will fight Cotto, what weight do you think they will fight? 147 or 154 or a catchweight?
    I don't honestly see Cotto at 154. He's too short. I think Cotto's one of these guys that's perfectly suited for 147 for as long as he wants to fight. Truth be told, I don't mind the occasional fighter jumping one or two weight classes, but this recent trend of fighters jumping several weight classes is starting to get old for me.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    2,781
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1201
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: From ESPN: Hoya vs. PAC in the works

    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TitoFan View Post

    Why should Tito go down to 154? They both fought at 160. And years have a way of making getting down to a certain weight that much harder. I say hold the fight at 160. But going down to meet Pac? That's just a bit much of a stretch to me.
    I guess Team Hoya offered Tito a fight at 154 but Team Tito said "no" or "can't". If Hoya will go down to 147 to fight PAC then Hoya considered PAC as a valuable opponent that he's willing to make concessions.

    If Hoya will fight Cotto, what weight do you think they will fight? 147 or 154 or a catchweight?
    I don't honestly see Cotto at 154. He's too short. I think Cotto's one of these guys that's perfectly suited for 147 for as long as he wants to fight. Truth be told, I don't mind the occasional fighter jumping one or two weight classes, but this recent trend of fighters jumping several weight classes is starting to get old for me.
    If fighters jump in weight for a shot at the title then I guess it's ok, but if just for sheer money making i.e.Trinidad-Jones and PAC-ODLH then I'd say no.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. How Religion works .....
    By X in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-20-2008, 11:42 PM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-18-2006, 12:03 AM
  3. ** MANFREDO VS. SPINA IN THE WORKS**
    By PRIDE OF BOSTON in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-12-2006, 12:54 AM
  4. How the hook works
    By mastergooch27 in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 08:52 PM
  5. What Works For You
    By Boxerjl in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-22-2006, 05:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing