Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 61

Thread: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

Share/Bookmark
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1451
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft View Post

    Respect it or not, Imo, Guzman is no threat for Pac.
    If you think that way, so be it.

    Joan Guzman doesn't give me butterfly in my chest. He can run all night against Pac, but he can't hide. He can match Pac's speed, but there's no way in hell he can match Pac's power and chin.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    i can't believe after all these years, people still think pac is going to get outboxed for 12 rounds. and to suggest guzman is the guy to do it, a guy who throws wide and trades with no POWER!? ha i laughed, the treats are the ones can end a fight at anytime. guzman had little power at superfeatherweight even though he blows up to 160 plus between fights. pac will not be outboxed for 12 rounds for sure in a few rounds but no way for 12 whole round. his way too quick and has his own skills to beat anyone out there.

    Guzman is an ok fighter but his not good enough to outbox pac for 12 rounds. Plus guzman doesn't have a granite chin now does he?
    Do you have to win all 12 rounds nowadays? Well in Pac fans mind that's probably the only way he loses but whatever.

    Pac has already been outboxed and beaten before by Morales and Marquez. Guzman would do it differently if he did it obvious but to say he's not a threat to Pacquiao is stupid, there are no two ways about it. Especially considering you guys think David Diaz presents some risk. What a joke PSL. He trades but he still doesn't get hit hardly at all and rarely gets hit clean.
    see what your not getting is that guzman is NO FLOYD, HIS NOT JMM NOR IS HE ERIC! his a mid 30 fighter that still unproven unlike those three guys, they were all top proven fighter before they even turned 30.

    no you don't need all 12 rounds but the ones he'll lose will take its toll on him, therfor he'll need to stay away while earning points which will be difficult cause if you can hit pac he can hit you. I don't think guzman will land enough for 12 rounds to win while being safe. if he makes it out for 12 rounds it could be a case of him not landing much pac chasing him and the fight is boring. Would be a win for pac cause his aggression vs guzmans avoiding will be the only thing the judge will have to score

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    OK I'm in some bizarro world I think right now. I'm a big Casamayor fan but he's an absolute shell of what he used to be. Am I the only one who remembers him dropping nearly every round to Santa Cruz? Santa Cruz? He was losing on the scorecards to the very unskilled Michael Katsidis. He's a shell who is one or two fights away from being retired or irrelevant in the lightweight division.

    Guzman however is in his prime and is one of the most talented fighters on the planet. That's how he's the much bigger threat to Pac.
    casa should of well damn lose that fight with santa cruz but remember he was coming off a long lay off, im not making any excuses but thats true. in the katsidis fight he showed his power is still there and he still can be slick.

    My point is, this guzman talk is unproven cause he hasnt impress me. Whos his biggest win and in what fasion? He has skills but imo is overhype. Plus his already mid 30's not only is he overhype imo, he can turn 50 over night any time now without power to save his ass. Unlike casa old as well but experienced with top fighter and he has power to end a fight still. and thats why i think his the bigger threat to pac and maybe the best lw right now til jmm and pac test the waters in the division.
    I'll tell you what, come back after the Campbell fight and after he beats the lightweight champ. If he beats him but I think he will. Will you still say he's not a threat? And he's facing a greater threat at lightweight times 10 then Pac is. Who cares what his age his? He debuted 2 years after Pacquiao, has a lot less ring wear too. He doesn't have half as many fights as Casa considering Casa's amateur career in Cuba. He's obviously still got the legs so what's the problem?

    But hey, if the fights took place on Boxrec Pac would win any day. I have some mean things to say but I'll save them.

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft View Post

    Respect it or not, Imo, Guzman is no threat for Pac.
    If you think that way, so be it.

    Joan Guzman doesn't give me butterfly in my chest. He can run all night against Pac, but he can't hide. He can match Pac's speed, but there's no way in hell he can match Pac's power and chin.
    he neg repped you, that must of tickled i hope you don't neg rep him back cause that would be freaking devestating

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    I didn't neg rep him just wanted to get it across that that statement was ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous but when it pertains to Pac I wouldn't expect much else from that crowd. And it would hardly be devastating, my rep doesn't come from a clan of strokers and/or an alternate account.

    PSL is a good poster though, I've got no problem with PSL but that comment was something I would expect from a wind up poster.
    Last edited by amat; 06-27-2008 at 01:31 AM.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Dawson Springs, KY
    Posts
    8,430
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1451
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacstraightleft View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post

    If you think that way, so be it.

    Joan Guzman doesn't give me butterfly in my chest. He can run all night against Pac, but he can't hide. He can match Pac's speed, but there's no way in hell he can match Pac's power and chin.
    he neg repped you, that must of tickled i hope you don't neg rep him back cause that would be freaking devestating
    I don't think he did. Maybe he just like the old CC/SC system.


  7. #52
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2129
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    OK I'm in some bizarro world I think right now. I'm a big Casamayor fan but he's an absolute shell of what he used to be. Am I the only one who remembers him dropping nearly every round to Santa Cruz? Santa Cruz? He was losing on the scorecards to the very unskilled Michael Katsidis. He's a shell who is one or two fights away from being retired or irrelevant in the lightweight division.

    Guzman however is in his prime and is one of the most talented fighters on the planet. That's how he's the much bigger threat to Pac.
    casa should of well damn lose that fight with santa cruz but remember he was coming off a long lay off, im not making any excuses but thats true. in the katsidis fight he showed his power is still there and he still can be slick.

    My point is, this guzman talk is unproven cause he hasnt impress me. Whos his biggest win and in what fasion? He has skills but imo is overhype. Plus his already mid 30's not only is he overhype imo, he can turn 50 over night any time now without power to save his ass. Unlike casa old as well but experienced with top fighter and he has power to end a fight still. and thats why i think his the bigger threat to pac and maybe the best lw right now til jmm and pac test the waters in the division.
    I'll tell you what, come back after the Campbell fight and after he beats the lightweight champ. If he beats him but I think he will. Will you still say he's not a threat? And he's facing a greater threat at lightweight times 10 then Pac is. Who cares what his age his? He debuted 2 years after Pacquiao, has a lot less ring wear too. He doesn't have half as many fights as Casa considering Casa's amateur career in Cuba. He's obviously still got the legs so what's the problem?

    But hey, if the fights took place on Boxrec Pac would win any day. I have some mean things to say but I'll save them.
    if he beats nate then i will say he has proven himself, but we've been talking about the current so right now his no threat. atleast not as much of a threat. You should start praying now though cause nate is similar to guzman, both started their pro career obnormally late. But yet Nates been in far better fighters already then guzman has. taht should tell you somethings.

    tell me all the mean things youve got to say, i want to laugh

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2547
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    OK I'm in some bizarro world I think right now. I'm a big Casamayor fan but he's an absolute shell of what he used to be. Am I the only one who remembers him dropping nearly every round to Santa Cruz? Santa Cruz? He was losing on the scorecards to the very unskilled Michael Katsidis. He's a shell who is one or two fights away from being retired or irrelevant in the lightweight division.

    Guzman however is in his prime and is one of the most talented fighters on the planet. That's how he's the much bigger threat to Pac.
    Pacland

    Casamayor is past it, can anyone imagine Guzman losing a round to Santa Cruz? Maybe if he was just cruising late but that would have been a total mismatch, rusty or not. And beating Katsidis is not that great of an accomplishment IMO and he had to go through a lot just to do that. Casamayor was a great fighter, he has bigger wins than Guzman but he's not the better fighter now. I feel this is so obvious I will quote Fenster. Fact.
    Last edited by OumaFan; 06-28-2008 at 03:08 PM.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Southport
    Posts
    8,224
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1865
    Cool Clicks

    Default Joan Guzman - Nate Campbell???

    I havent read much about this match up but I noticed on boxrec it says its going to happen. I might just be really slow about this match up but I havent heard shit. But I think its an outstanding one and I think this fight could be enough to entice Manny back to 135 where he belongs. This match IMO will show who needs to fight Manny. Fuck ODHL, hes way too big. Mannys career can be defined with a fight against the winner of this fight and it must happen! 147 is far too heavy for him.

    I think Guzman can do this. He is so fast and I think hes the real man at 135. Hes the one guy IMO who can beat manny at 135 and I just want this match up to happen.
    Last edited by Tam Seddon; 07-23-2008 at 12:35 PM.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joan Guzman - Nate Campbell???

    This is actually at 135. For all of Campbell's titles. And I'm taking Guzman too, think he's of the most talented guy in boxing.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    329
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joan Guzman - Nate Campbell???

    Guzman is fresher and is the better skilled fighter infact he is probably top 5 most skilled fighter in boxing today if he had power he would be a force to be wreckoned with

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    11,799
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2276
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Joan Guzman - Nate Campbell???

    If Nate shows up driven as he was against Juan Diaz I think he can beat the uber talented Guzman, however Guzman is class.
    091

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"


  14. #59
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Brucelee never even posted in this thread

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    1,826
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1216
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Nate Campbell-Joan Guzman "all but set"

    Guzman could and would. His best wins were against a gatekeeper(Barrios) and a contender (Sotto)

    Guzman is a great fighter by potential not by accomplishment.

    beat Campbell (Impressively)and have a better chance of landing pac.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-18-2008, 09:50 PM
  2. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 05-07-2008, 11:15 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing