not if I had anything to do with it.....
![]()
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
not if I had anything to do with it.....
![]()
Array
He did everything Hatton and Calzaghe have done but quicker he was alot better talent that these 2
Array
Array
He should probably be in it. He was a great fighter and entertainer.
However he never made any attempt to avenge the 1 defeat on his record unlike guys like Lennox Lewis etc who cemented their legacy by beating the folk they lost to. That is my only problem with Naz's career.
Plus he is a bit of a wanker.
Array
Array
OK, OK, THAT SEALS IT. Based on the posts herein, the consensus is for his induction. I'm calling Ed Brophy of the Hall tomorrow and demanding it!![]()
Array
Yes, the Hall of Lame. No, seriously he should get in, but probably down the line, I don't see it as a big injustice if he doesn't. He ended on a real sour note.
Array
He should get in,there are less deserving than him allready in!
Array
I hate Hamed,can not stand him one iota
But I would find it hard to keep him out of the hall. You arent talking to a Prince detractor,your talking to a Prince absolute loather
He's earned a spot
Array
Array
Array
Naseem Hamed is not a HOF fighter. He was an entertaining fighter, a charismatic fighter, but not a HOF fighter.
Array
I agree with that.
He was limited as a boxer but unfortunately it is hard to deny his achievements. Believe me i have never liked Prince Naseem and was very happy when Barrera schooled him but the amount of titles he won must make him a contender for the HOF.
However other sports don't allow people to be inducted to their HOF when they have done something to bring the name of the sport into disrepute. Naseem has recently and has never conducted himself in a way that would make people think about boxing as a noble and dignified sport. For that he should not be inducted.
“If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apologize.” Muhammad Ali.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks