This is whats wrong with the 10 point must system.
If a fighter is getting beaten badly for 2 minutes 59 seconds of the round but then lands a flash knockdown he wins the round.
The knockdown could be a graze of a glove to the canvas, or even achieved by the fighter being more off-balance than anything but nevertheless its stilll worth 2 points.
It can be complicated but it shouldn't be so black and white, when considering the points from a KD it should be really worth noting whether they deserved the 2 points. Such variables should include:
Was the fighter really hurt from the KD?
Was it more of an issue of the fighter being off-balance?
Was it just a scrape of the glove that touched the canvas?


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 

Reply With Quote
Bookmarks