Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Agree or disagree with the rule changes

Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Rule changes in boxing.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Down In The Valley
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1465
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rule changes in boxing.

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post


    Yeah but realistically these organizations aren't going anywhere, It would be an ideal situation to simply have the Ring title IMO. I can't see the alphabets saying "we no longer have a need for money" unfortunately though.

    And Ring is in for what? Cookies and milk?
    The Ring does not collect sanctioning fees.
    The Ring sells mag's and the more they sell, the more they make. Just like all the rest of them.
    Hidden Content Boot Hill, Where the Real Fights Are Fought.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4435
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rule changes in boxing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post


    And Ring is in for what? Cookies and milk?
    The Ring does not collect sanctioning fees.
    The Ring sells mag's and the more they sell, the more they make. Just like all the rest of them.

    Yes the ring is a business, but they do not profit by having multiple titles like Interim, Super, Emeritus, which is exactly what this topic is about. Making money from selling magazines will happen regardless if they have a vacant champ or a champ in place. The alphabets only get paid if someone pays sanctioning fees (compounded by the different sub-titles)
    So the WBA for example could be receiving fees from their Regular, Super and Interim titlists at the same time, so it is in their best interest to have MORE titles. That is the difference here. You have to fight to earn a Ring top 10 spot, you have to PAY to earn an alphabet top 10 spot.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Should There Be 3 Knockdown's Rule ??
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 04:49 PM
  2. If you could change one rule....
    By SweetPea in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-07-2007, 03:08 PM
  3. TV RULE FIGHTS ?
    By Counter in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-04-2007, 11:46 PM
  4. WORST RULE EVER!!!
    By El Kabong in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-25-2006, 12:51 PM
  5. NEW BOXING RULE, FROM ICE :)
    By ICEMAN JDS in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-09-2006, 12:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing