Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Agree or disagree with the rule changes

Results 1 to 15 of 31

Thread: Rule changes in boxing.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4427
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rule changes in boxing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    I can not ever see The politicos going to one Champion in each division,Just will not happen.Far to many affiliated slicksters getting fat on sanctioning fees and back room money in general.

    The Replay scenario is so overdue its absents makes Boxing look stuck in the stone ages at times.There are crystal clear examples (Friday night most recently) in which a thought out managed system could have been utilized to ensure a just and fair call when a fighters future hangs in the balance......on nearly every descision made by the officials.The Commissions need to show half the balls the fighters do,a step in the right direction.
    Not saying one champ per division, one champ per alphabet org.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,078
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5123
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Rule changes in boxing.

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Spicoli surfs 'Nawlins View Post
    I can not ever see The politicos going to one Champion in each division,Just will not happen.Far to many affiliated slicksters getting fat on sanctioning fees and back room money in general.

    The Replay scenario is so overdue its absents makes Boxing look stuck in the stone ages at times.There are crystal clear examples (Friday night most recently) in which a thought out managed system could have been utilized to ensure a just and fair call when a fighters future hangs in the balance......on nearly every descision made by the officials.The Commissions need to show half the balls the fighters do,a step in the right direction.
    Not saying one champ per division, one champ per alphabet org.
    I'm with ya but the genie is out of the bottle.That would call for universal reform.....maybe even The Gov getting invold? Might be like trying to herd (regulate) cats .They are glutinous slobs feeding at the buffet and have already seen what they can make coming up with sub-sub Championships....."W.B.A Youth Championship" Wtf How about we find a way to have only one Alphabet racket per division

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Should There Be 3 Knockdown's Rule ??
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 04:49 PM
  2. If you could change one rule....
    By SweetPea in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-07-2007, 03:08 PM
  3. TV RULE FIGHTS ?
    By Counter in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-04-2007, 11:46 PM
  4. WORST RULE EVER!!!
    By El Kabong in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-25-2006, 12:51 PM
  5. NEW BOXING RULE, FROM ICE :)
    By ICEMAN JDS in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-09-2006, 12:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing