Re: Roy Jones: the boxing genius

Originally Posted by
hitmandonny

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
hitmandonny
Well, Jones actually attempted to box quite well in the amateurs.
Although he was a standout amateur, he was not invincible, so famously beaten by McClellan.
Jones then turned pro. His speed, athleticism and power allowed him to destroy opposition.
Until he was opposed by fighters of good ability that could cope with his power.
In these situations Jones could not adjust, he didn't have skills per se.
He was easily cornered and not slick on defense in close as we can see against Tarver and Johnson.
I just imagine them the same size.
And skill beats natural ability.
You should only really judge fighters when in their prime. Do you think a younger Jones would have lost against those two?
Objectively, pound for pound, probably not, but we were never given any reason to believe he had left his prime, he had just won the heavyweight title we thought he was invincible, I'm sure none of us imagined he had left his prime when he boxed Johnson and Tarver the first times.
At the time of the first Tarver fight Roy was 34. Even with the weightloss excuse it wasn't a surprise that the guy was slipping. Tarver two proved it. The Johnson fight should never have even happened.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks