Should Michael Nunn be in the Hall?

**holmcall** · 08-29-2008 09:30 PM

Originally Posted by Thread Stealer

Originally Posted by LeonardW12Hagler

Originally Posted by ssss

Sugar Ray Leonard a great ambassador for the sport ? didn't he have cocaine addiction ? and i didn't think Muhammad Ali was a great ambassador for the sport either with his racism and disrespectful attitude to his opponents.

Really I wasn't aware of Ray Leonard ever being accused of that WOW

Leonard later admitted to having abused alcohol, cocaine, and his wife Juanita.

I don't really think anything boxers having problems outside the ring in terms of their HOF status.

Lots of great boxers were scumbags outside the ring. Some of the stuff that guys like Ray Robinson, Jake LaMotta, Carlos Monzon, for instance, did, were just disgusting.

I agree 100%, unless what they do outside the ring affects their performance inside the ring, and I can't think of many cases where that has happened. Camacho stole something a while back in Miss. He is still fighting. The two are unrelated. Boxing is the one occupation where what you did before doesn't not matter. On balance, I'd vote Nunn in if I had a vote which I don't.

**match** · 08-30-2008 12:52 AM

IMO Nunn was simply a real good fighter, and only great fighters should be inducted, which he was not.

**holmcall** · 08-30-2008 08:16 PM

But what about INGO, Polomino, Barry, Norton, Saad, Cuevas and some others? Not trying to argue the point, but I say Nunn is better than a lot of the guys who are in there.