Quote Originally Posted by MOOG
CLYDEY 2 I don't know how you can possible say that Alex Arthur is better than Scott Harrison, what has he acheived in comparision to Scott Harrison. I tell you nothing. Arthur is 27 years old and has not fought for a world title, and he'll get hammered when he does. He is a European class fighter at best, who's he beat of note. Did Arthur not say only last month that Harrison is too good for him at present. Scott Harrison won a world title when he was 24, and has careers wins over a lot of world class boxers like Mendina, McCullogh, Steve Robinson, Hussein, Tracey Patterson, Chacon. These are all boxers that have been world champs, and did tell me what world champions has Arthur beat. Only 1,000 fans at his last fight in Edinburgh, just shows how much the people in his own city think of Arthur. Arthur talks a better fight than anyone, but pity he does not show it in the ring.
Mate you are obvioulsy Harrisons biggest fan, but them fighters you have mentioned he has beaton were a mixture of has beens and gate keepers, Mcullough was 4/5 years past his best, Medina beat Scott when he shouldnt have in the first place who also had seen his best days and had been exposed numerous times previous, Robinson?? was shot to pieces about 3 ears earlier and Chacon who the hell has he fought, Scott has fought no one and his hardest opponent to date would of been Guzman but that never happened for a champ who has held the belt for 4/5 years its a pretty average list of opponents, go and check what Buchanen has done and you will see Scott isn't in the same league. if Harrison would or did ever step it up he would of been exposed in my opinion there has been so many opponents in and around his division over the past five years why has he not fought any greats? there must of been at least 3/4/5 future Hall of famers he could of fought but kept to figthing has beens and to be honest sub standard opponents.