Your right.This was a failure in its highest form.Stuck in the past,they clearly witnessed the headclash,ref actually reversed initial call "upon consultationOriginally Posted by CutMeMick
".
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Just a dude in blue.
Array
Re: No change in the ruling of Thompson-Arvin?
Your right.This was a failure in its highest form.Stuck in the past,they clearly witnessed the headclash,ref actually reversed initial call "upon consultation
Forum Champ
Array
Re: No change in the ruling of Thompson-Arvin?
If you listen in after the third round, you can hear someone say 'headbutt' and it is repeated, then Tessitore says the REF said it was a headbutt. So how was that not the case? Also, after the knockdown, the referee told Arvin he could 'still get back in it...' is that appropriate? I know people don't like to talk about stolen or fixed fights, but was he giving himself away in these hints?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks