Quote Originally Posted by bigragu
Quote Originally Posted by nuclear bull
top 10, he wouldn't make the top 100, i never liked this flash,disrespecting prat, he made a carreer from beating has beens and never beens
look at my post..you are way off....you might not agree with his style but his results speak volumes...He was a great featherweight....
Your post is irrelevant though.

The people you mentioned didn't defend their tittles against the people nas did. its like saying klitchkov goes on a great tittle defence run, the comparing him to Ali down to the fact of tittle defences lol

Take Calzaghe, most people from the states didn't rate him, called him everyname under the sun, if a Jeff lacy didn't come along, calzaghes title defences would of been said to be a collection of nobody's and hes reign thought to be a joke.

The Barrera who beat him, was imo not even close to being the great fighter he has become. Nas v Barrera then, nas was in his prim, sure he wasn't prolly working as hard to get into the fight right, but age wise he should of been in his prime. If he was stupid enough to half ass his training and the rest of the crap he done then, there is a valid point of putting him in the top 100 - hate nas but i wouldn't know where to put him as i don't know enough about the other fighters..

But lets face it, raw natural speed, power and talent still doesn't make you a top 10 fighter - and imo nas proved that to us all

only thing i am sure on, is a prime Barrera, prime morales and prime pacquio would of all either stopped or KO 'the prince' - some will disagree but that I'd bet my house on.