scorecards for DLH - Tito ?

[Mr140]

Well i sure the hell did not and he was robbed should of won the fight with out the last rounds he was clearly beating Tito.

[ICB]

Well i sure the hell did not and he was robbed should of won the fight with out the last rounds he was clearly beating Tito.

How could ODLH have been robbed ? when Tito done no worse than win 2 out of the first 9 rounds. Including winning the last 3 rounds, and thats still only 7-5 to ODLH.

Like i already said to Taeth RBR scoring wise it was close and in no way a robbery, you want to know what a robbery is ? Pernell Whitaker vs Jose Luis Ramirez 1, i had Whitaker winning 8-3-1 now thats what you call a robbery.

[Mr140]

Well Ice when the last time you have seen the fight and i tell you what i do a round by round if i can find the thing still think it clear win for Oscar.

[SweetPea]

I'll have to watch this again to be sure... but if I remember correctly, when I've watched this fight before, I usually score it 114-114. Oscar up 6-2 and on his way to an easy decision, then he gives away the last 4 to let Tito get a draw.

For what it's worth, I usually score Oscar-Mosley II a draw as well.

[OumaFan]

I had Mosley winning both ODLH fights. ODLH gets so much credit for flurries that don't land, very talented in that respect.

[OumaFan]

And he's also very skilled at covering most of his upper body with padding.

I wish so much I could find the picture of Oscar with Mosley after that fight, his protective padding was in his armpits.

[OumaFan]

I had DLH-Tito a draw.

Obviously DLH was much more dominant when he was winning rounds (although again he had the flurries that don't land going for him) but that's not the point. It doesn't matter how much Tito did late, he did more than Oscar.

[TitoFan]

I had Mosley winning both ODLH fights. ODLH gets so much credit for flurries that don't land, very talented in that respect.

AMEN TO THAT, BROTHER!!!!!

[SweetPea]

I had Mosley winning both ODLH fights. ODLH gets so much credit for flurries that don't land, very talented in that respect.

AMEN TO THAT, BROTHER!!!!!

And this is why it's important to watch/score controversial Oscar fights with the volume off. Lampley has an orgasm everytime Oscar throws one of those 8 punch flurries where 1 punch lands.

[Taeth]

I had Mosley winning both ODLH fights. ODLH gets so much credit for flurries that don't land, very talented in that respect.

Oscar didn't beat Mosley in the second fight with flurries, he beat in him with small combinations, and that left jab that he couldn't land that well in the first fight. He also used better movement and a better right hand. He simply outlanded Mosley by such a large margin that there is no way he didn't win that fight.

[Bookkeeper]

I had Mosley winning both ODLH fights. ODLH gets so much credit for flurries that don't land, very talented in that respect.

Oscar didn't beat Mosley in the second fight with flurries, he beat in him with small combinations, and that left jab that he couldn't land that well in the first fight. He also used better movement and a better right hand. He simply outlanded Mosley by such a large margin that there is no way he didn't win that fight.

I could have sworn I had a debate with you before about the Whitaker Vs De La Hoya fight, and you told me that Oscar clearly one despite Whitaker landing 100 more punches than Oscar, then you come back in this thread and say that Oscar outlanded Mosley by such a large margin it's no way he didn't win that fight. That sounds like a double edge sword to me. I could be wrong it could have been someone else but for some reason I remember your forum name, am I wrong or right

[Taeth]

Well i sure the hell did not and he was robbed should of won the fight with out the last rounds he was clearly beating Tito.

How could ODLH have been robbed ? when Tito done no worse than win 2 out of the first 9 rounds. Including winning the last 3 rounds, and thats still only 7-5 to ODLH.

Like i already said to Taeth RBR scoring wise it was close and in no way a robbery, you want to know what a robbery is ? Pernell Whitaker vs Jose Luis Ramirez 1, i had Whitaker winning 8-3-1 now thats what you call a robbery.

It was a robbery, It was of the same proportions as Whitaker-Ramirez, Whitaker-Chavez, etc.

Trinidad didn't win any early rounds, what fight were you guys watching? Do I have to do over it round by round with all of you?

We should have a section on this forum where somehow controversial fights are streamed "live", and we debate it in a msn type format

[ICB]

Well i sure the hell did not and he was robbed should of won the fight with out the last rounds he was clearly beating Tito.

How could ODLH have been robbed ? when Tito done no worse than win 2 out of the first 9 rounds. Including winning the last 3 rounds, and thats still only 7-5 to ODLH.

Like i already said to Taeth RBR scoring wise it was close and in no way a robbery, you want to know what a robbery is ? Pernell Whitaker vs Jose Luis Ramirez 1, i had Whitaker winning 8-3-1 now thats what you call a robbery.

It was a robbery, It was of the same proportions as Whitaker-Ramirez, Whitaker-Chavez, etc.

Trinidad didn't win any early rounds, what fight were you guys watching? Do I have to do over it round by round with all of you?

We should have a section on this forum where somehow controversial fights are streamed "live", and we debate it in a msn type format

You can't actually be serious Taeth ? i respect your opinion normally but on the same par as Whitaker vs Chavez/Ramirez 1 ? are you kidding me ?

Whitaker gave Chavez and Ramirez boxing lessons, the Ramirez fight was never close at any point except for a few of the middle rounds. And the Chavez fight was only competitive for 5 rounds, then Whitaker totally took over and won every round after that. With only the 12th round being debatable.

And why should "you" do a RBR for us like you know something that we don't ? Felix Trinidad got outboxed in the first 9 rounds, no one has denied that i believe. But it was no way a shutout in those first 9 rounds, Felix Trinidad done no worse than win atleast 2 rounds during those first 9 rounds.

Then Tito clearly won the last 3 rounds which makes it a close fight, ODLH may have won his rounds more clearly. And landed alot more punches in the rounds he won, but RBR wise it was a close fight and in no way a robbery.

I have no problem with fans thinking ODLH won, and i think fans can clearly make a better arguement for ODLH winning. But a robbery ? hell no.

[Taeth]

How could ODLH have been robbed ? when Tito done no worse than win 2 out of the first 9 rounds. Including winning the last 3 rounds, and thats still only 7-5 to ODLH.

Like i already said to Taeth RBR scoring wise it was close and in no way a robbery, you want to know what a robbery is ? Pernell Whitaker vs Jose Luis Ramirez 1, i had Whitaker winning 8-3-1 now thats what you call a robbery.

It was a robbery, It was of the same proportions as Whitaker-Ramirez, Whitaker-Chavez, etc.

Trinidad didn't win any early rounds, what fight were you guys watching? Do I have to do over it round by round with all of you?

We should have a section on this forum where somehow controversial fights are streamed "live", and we debate it in a msn type format

You can't actually be serious Taeth ? i respect your opinion normally but on the same par as Whitaker vs Chavez/Ramirez 1 ? are you kidding me ?

Whitaker gave Chavez and Ramirez boxing lessons, the Ramirez fight was never close at any point except for a few of the middle rounds. And the Chavez fight was only competitive for 5 rounds, then Whitaker totally took over and won every round after that. With only the 12th round being debatable.

And why should "you" do a RBR for us like you know something that we don't ? Felix Trinidad got outboxed in the first 9 rounds, no one has denied that i believe. But it was no way a shutout in those first 9 rounds, Felix Trinidad done no worse than win atleast 2 rounds during those first 9 rounds.

Then Tito clearly won the last 3 rounds which makes it a close fight, ODLH may have won his rounds more clearly. And landed alot more punches in the rounds he won, but RBR wise it was a close fight and in no way a robbery.

You can shut out trinidad Because he didn't win any of the beginig rounds in My opinion I will go over the 4th and 1st round.

[hitmanhatton]

It was a robbery, It was of the same proportions as Whitaker-Ramirez, Whitaker-Chavez, etc.

Trinidad didn't win any early rounds, what fight were you guys watching? Do I have to do over it round by round with all of you?

We should have a section on this forum where somehow controversial fights are streamed "live", and we debate it in a msn type format

You can't actually be serious Taeth ? i respect your opinion normally but on the same par as Whitaker vs Chavez/Ramirez 1 ? are you kidding me ?

Whitaker gave Chavez and Ramirez boxing lessons, the Ramirez fight was never close at any point except for a few of the middle rounds. And the Chavez fight was only competitive for 5 rounds, then Whitaker totally took over and won every round after that. With only the 12th round being debatable.

And why should "you" do a RBR for us like you know something that we don't ? Felix Trinidad got outboxed in the first 9 rounds, no one has denied that i believe. But it was no way a shutout in those first 9 rounds, Felix Trinidad done no worse than win atleast 2 rounds during those first 9 rounds.

Then Tito clearly won the last 3 rounds which makes it a close fight, ODLH may have won his rounds more clearly. And landed alot more punches in the rounds he won, but RBR wise it was a close fight and in no way a robbery.

You can shut out trinidad Because he didn't win any of the beginig rounds in My opinion I will go over the 4th and 1st round.

true he didnt win many of the early rounds, it was around 5-2 oscar after 7 imo but from the 8th onwards tito took every round, well oscar threw them away more than anything