I had Mosley winning both ODLH fights. ODLH gets so much credit for flurries that don't land, very talented in that respect.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
I had Mosley winning both ODLH fights. ODLH gets so much credit for flurries that don't land, very talented in that respect.
And he's also very skilled at covering most of his upper body with padding.
I wish so much I could find the picture of Oscar with Mosley after that fight, his protective padding was in his armpits.
I had DLH-Tito a draw.
Obviously DLH was much more dominant when he was winning rounds (although again he had the flurries that don't land going for him) but that's not the point. It doesn't matter how much Tito did late, he did more than Oscar.
Array
Array
Oscar didn't beat Mosley in the second fight with flurries, he beat in him with small combinations, and that left jab that he couldn't land that well in the first fight. He also used better movement and a better right hand. He simply outlanded Mosley by such a large margin that there is no way he didn't win that fight.
I could have sworn I had a debate with you before about the Whitaker Vs De La Hoya fight, and you told me that Oscar clearly one despite Whitaker landing 100 more punches than Oscar, then you come back in this thread and say that Oscar outlanded Mosley by such a large margin it's no way he didn't win that fight. That sounds like a double edge sword to me. I could be wrong it could have been someone else but for some reason I remember your forum name, am I wrong or right
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks