scorecards for DLH - Tito ?

[ICB]

Well i sure the hell did not and he was robbed should of won the fight with out the last rounds he was clearly beating Tito.

How could ODLH have been robbed ? when Tito done no worse than win 2 out of the first 9 rounds. Including winning the last 3 rounds, and thats still only 7-5 to ODLH.

Like i already said to Taeth RBR scoring wise it was close and in no way a robbery, you want to know what a robbery is ? Pernell Whitaker vs Jose Luis Ramirez 1, i had Whitaker winning 8-3-1 now thats what you call a robbery.

It was a robbery, It was of the same proportions as Whitaker-Ramirez, Whitaker-Chavez, etc.

Trinidad didn't win any early rounds, what fight were you guys watching? Do I have to do over it round by round with all of you?

We should have a section on this forum where somehow controversial fights are streamed "live", and we debate it in a msn type format

You can't actually be serious Taeth ? i respect your opinion normally but on the same par as Whitaker vs Chavez/Ramirez 1 ? are you kidding me ?

Whitaker gave Chavez and Ramirez boxing lessons, the Ramirez fight was never close at any point except for a few of the middle rounds. And the Chavez fight was only competitive for 5 rounds, then Whitaker totally took over and won every round after that. With only the 12th round being debatable.

And why should "you" do a RBR for us like you know something that we don't ? Felix Trinidad got outboxed in the first 9 rounds, no one has denied that i believe. But it was no way a shutout in those first 9 rounds, Felix Trinidad done no worse than win atleast 2 rounds during those first 9 rounds.

Then Tito clearly won the last 3 rounds which makes it a close fight, ODLH may have won his rounds more clearly. And landed alot more punches in the rounds he won, but RBR wise it was a close fight and in no way a robbery.

I have no problem with fans thinking ODLH won, and i think fans can clearly make a better arguement for ODLH winning. But a robbery ? hell no.