scorecards for DLH - Tito ?

[brucelee]

I thought Oscar won the fight hands down Tito did nothing to deserve the win because of that win is why he is even mention with Oscar. Oscar Clearly outboxed him and he was robbed but o well its boxing and it happens to everyone. The only people taht i thought beat Oscar Clearly were Mosley at welter weight, Hopkins and Mayweather. But i while say only person to beat him in prime was Mosley. Never thought that Oscar really ever got dominated in a fight but that is just a thought.

No one was robbed i hate that term used in a close fight like this, and for the record i thought Pernell Whitaker beat a prime ODLH.

Pernell lost a close fight, but Oscar won that, That right hand was landing too often for Oscar. Also this was a robbery, it was a comprehensive boxing lesson that was placed on Tito. Even in the last 3 rounds, Oscar wasn't punching, but Tito didn't dominate those rounds, he just won them because he was more aggressive. Oscar took him to school, and got robbed. He also deserved to beat Mosley at 154, he outboxed him as well.

Pardon me for deviating from the topic but Oscar vs Mosley was very sweet. I became a true Mosley fan after that.


I will watch again the Oscar vs Tito fight. I have forgotten that fight already.

[mike_tha_man]

Like ICB i had it a draw. could have gone easily either way. and i understand exactly what he is saying. Oscar, when he one a round, won them way more convincinly than Tito. but in a RBR i had it a draw.

[Markusdarkus]

I actually think it ranks with:

Mayweather v Castillo I, Barerra v Morales I and Holyfield v Lewis I

As one of the worst dec ive seen live.

[GAME]

I actually think it ranks with:

Mayweather v Castillo I, Barerra v Morales I and Holyfield v Lewis I

As one of the worst dec ive seen live.

Youre right those 3 were terrible decisions.

I dont think Oscar - Tito ranks with them though

[ICB]

I actually think it ranks with:

Mayweather v Castillo I, Barerra v Morales I and Holyfield v Lewis I

As one of the worst dec ive seen live.

How was Mayweather vs Castillo 1 a terrible decision ? i only had Castillo winning by 1 point, but there were quite alot of close rounds. And you could make an arguement that either fight won 7 rounds. And i think Mayweather done very well considering he had a bad soulder injury.

Barerra is one of my favorites but again how was it a terrible decision ? the knockdown was BS and shouldn't have been called, but even with the knockdown its still a very close fight. I had Barrera winning because he landed the harder shots.

But in no way was it a terrible decision. And considering Barerra got a controversial win in the 2nd fight, i think it was fair that were 1-1 until the 3rd fight which Barrera proved he was the better man without any controversy.

I totally agree with Lewis vs Holyfield 1 that was indeed a robbery, Holyfield at best only won 3 rounds.

[Markusdarkus]

I actually think it ranks with:

Mayweather v Castillo I, Barerra v Morales I and Holyfield v Lewis I

As one of the worst dec ive seen live.

How was Mayweather vs Castillo 1 a terrible decision ? i only had Castillo winning by 1 point, but there were quite alot of close rounds. And you could make an arguement that either fight won 7 rounds. And i think Mayweather done very well considering he had a bad soulder injury.

Barerra is one of my favorites but again how was it a terrible decision ? the knockdown was BS and shouldn't have been called, but even with the knockdown its still a very close fight. I had Barrera winning because he landed the harder shots.

But in no way was it a terrible decision. And considering Barerra got a controversial win in the 2nd fight, i think it was fair that were 1-1 until the 3rd fight which Barrera proved he was the better man without any controversy.

I totally agree with Lewis vs Holyfield 1 that was indeed a robbery, Holyfield at best only won 3 rounds.

I love how subjective scoring is.

But because Barerra got a gift in the rematch doesnt mean the first result was in anyway just.

And i thought Castillo was up 4pts maybe 5. 100 more power shots 150 more shots landed. i know compubox is not to be taken as a sure but mahone!

[ICB]

I actually think it ranks with:

Mayweather v Castillo I, Barerra v Morales I and Holyfield v Lewis I

As one of the worst dec ive seen live.

How was Mayweather vs Castillo 1 a terrible decision ? i only had Castillo winning by 1 point, but there were quite alot of close rounds. And you could make an arguement that either fight won 7 rounds. And i think Mayweather done very well considering he had a bad soulder injury.

Barerra is one of my favorites but again how was it a terrible decision ? the knockdown was BS and shouldn't have been called, but even with the knockdown its still a very close fight. I had Barrera winning because he landed the harder shots.

But in no way was it a terrible decision. And considering Barerra got a controversial win in the 2nd fight, i think it was fair that were 1-1 until the 3rd fight which Barrera proved he was the better man without any controversy.

I totally agree with Lewis vs Holyfield 1 that was indeed a robbery, Holyfield at best only won 3 rounds.

I love how subjective scoring is.

But because Barerra got a gift in the rematch doesnt mean the first result was in anyway just.

And i thought Castillo was up 4pts maybe 5. 100 more power shots 150 more shots landed. i know compubox is not to be taken as a sure but mahone!

4 or 5 points is a joke i've never seen anyone have that score, except for Harold Ledderman and his scoring is very questionable to say the least. Castillo done nothing in the first 5 rounds. You could make an argument that Mayweather swept the first 5 rounds, then won atleast another 2 rounds.

Especially the 11th which was very close, i had Mayweather winning 4 out of the first 5 rounds by the way, and i would love to know these so called 100 more power shots, because Castillo mostly threw arm punches on the inside. Im not saying he didn't land more power shots which he clearly did, but not as many as punchstats gave him credit for IMO. But Mayweather also used his jab to good effect, which some fans might of liked more.

Barerrea vs Morales 1 was a very close fight and without the KD, you could make an arguement that Morales may have won or earned a draw. Because even though Barrera landed the harder shots, he got out punched in some rounds, and some people might like the higher workrate of Morales. Rather than the more accurate harder shots of Barrera. But Barrera won by no more than 2 rounds, i only had him winning by 1 point.

The point im making is that none of these fights were terrible decision, and i hate it when people label close fights as robberies or bad decision's. Your 3rd example was the best because that clearly was a robbery.