Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Array
No, no he's not. He hasn't corrected you on one actual thing you have said from what I read. He just said you have no idea who his teachers are therefore you can't comment on what he's being taught. And he's right.
Array
This is the last time I'm responding to your lunacy. Whatever modicum of respect I once had for you as a poster is gone. Am I speaking fucking Klingon here?
Maybe if I capitalize what I am typing you will understand it better. YOU DO NOT KNOW MY PROFESSORS, YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY TEACH AND WHAT THEIR POSITIONS ARE. YOU CANNOT NAME ONE OF THEM, NOR DO YOU KNOW WHAT SCHOOL I ATTEND. I HAVE REBUTTED EVERY SINGLE POINT YOU HAVE MADE IN REGARDS TO THEM, YET YOU CONTINUE STUMBLING FROM ONE FAULTY POSITION TO THE NEXT. YOU ASSUME THAT EVERYTHING EXISTS THE WAY YOU IMAGINE IT TO BECAUSE YOU ARE CLEARLY DELUSIONAL OR PERHAPS YOU ARE SIMPLY FUNCTIONALLY RETARDED, I DO NOT KNOW. I DO NOT CARE. I KNOW IT IS HARD FOR PEOPLE LIKE YOU TO UNDERSTAND THAT THERE IS A WORLD OUTSIDE OF THE BORDERS OF YOUR COUNTRY. I LIVE IN CANADA (pronounced Can-ah-duh, it's a lovely place, but I digress) IT IS NOT PART OF AMERICA (believe it or not), AND WHATEVER CONSPIRACY YOU PERCEIVE TO BE TAKING PLACE IN THE U.S. IS NOT OCCURRING HERE. MY BOOKS DO NOT COME FROM TEXAS, MY TEACHERS ARE NOT PART OF A MASSIVE CONSPIRACY, THEY DO NOT CONCERN THEMSELVES WITH ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE FACTS.
I ASK YOU AGAIN, SINCE YOU CLAIM KNOW SO MUCH ABOUT MY PROFESSORS, WHAT ARE THEIR NAMES? WHAT HAVE THEY WRITTEN WHICH JUSTIFIES YOUR WILD ASSERTIONS? JUSTIFY ANYTHING YOU HAVE SAID AS IT RELATES TO ME.
YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED ANY OF THE FLAWS I HAVE RAISED IN YOUR RIDICULOUS ASSERTIONS, NOR HAVE YOU ANSWERED ANY OF MY QUESTIONS. SURPRISE SURPRISE.
When you are ready to rebut ANY of my assertions, which you are clearly unable to do, feel free to reply.
Last edited by CFH; 10-07-2008 at 01:31 AM.
Array
Array
And since your so concerned with my problem,being told that my opinions on the politics of my own country in a time frame you werent alive for are invalid,is more then a little insulting
Array
When did I say they were invalid? All I did was say that Carter's failure to be re-elected was due to more than the hostage crises. You subsequently lost your mind, but that is not my problem.
PS. History is all about talking about time frames most historians weren't alive for.
Edit: For the record, I consider them to be invalid now, because you've demonstrated that you are an idiot, but prior to this I considered them quite valid.
Array
C'mon, try and guess their names again. You got the Province right last time, it shouldn't be too hard.
Array
There is also an oral history and a written history,to ignore either is to ignore the full panorama
And facts are facts,the economy didnt get signifigantly worse under Carter,nor did it get any better. Actually if you count getting OPEC off our ass,it did improve
But the only story you could find on the news that election year,was the hostages
Array
If you lived through it...and the only news you saw were stories on the hostages, aren't you defeating your own point?![]()
Really, this reminds me a Starr type argument.
"I know more, here let me try to divert the subject, ok were off subject now lets go back to the original subject"
Ridiculous.
Array
And please lets examine the thought of
"Lost all respective for you as a poster"
"What is your problem"
"You lost your mind"
Who indeed,has lost their mind?
Did I fight fire with fire,or did you allow your emotions to get the better of your rational thought?
Array
You're the one ignoring "the full panorama" by claiming that it was due to one thing only, but that doesn't really matter because I mostly agree with you on it, as I previously stated.
Now back up some of the ridiculous bullshit you've spewed. C'mon fuckwit, do it.
What about the text books, what about my profs? UBC was a good guess, but really, since I have the BC flag under my name it's not that impressive. Hell, I've mentioned my school on here many times.
Array
To put it in to full perspective,it would be like somebody 20 years my juniour telling me that Cobb really had a chance against Holmes.
I watched the fight live for gods sake
And then when I pointed that out,them saying,"Well I read somewhere he was really in that fight"
Array
Array
Array
lol, you're the one who claims to already know their positions, shouldn't you have their names? I would be shocked if you would make those kind of statements without doing your research first.
Or could it be that you are just some know it all asshole? Nah, I'm sure you know their names.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks