Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 124

Thread: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post



    Can you elaborate further on that controversial statement?


    Watching the two (prime4prime) i think McCallum would have taken Hagler. Hagler and Hearns ducked Mike, both have said so.

    McCallum against (Real 160lb fighters) Watson, Graham, Collins, Jackson) was truely great. He also beat a great 147lb fighter in better Fashion than Hagler did in Don Curry.

    Hagler is top 3 all time fav fighters i just think mid 80s at 160 Mike would have beat him on points.

    Mike McCallum one of the greatest under-rated fighters ever. The body snatcher was the man.
    I don't dispute that McCallum was a great fighter, but Hagler is an ATG.

    Regardless of weight, Hagler's best wins are head and shoulders above those of McCallum.

    McCullum is an ATG.

    Are Haglers really better? MCCullum best 6 wins:

    1. James Toney (prime)
    2. Don Curry
    3. Steve Collins
    4. Michael Watson (Who schooled Been and Eubank)
    5. Julian Jackson (In 2, first Jackson loss)
    6. Herol Graham


    McCallum was ducked by all the greats, why? because he was a great.

    Listen a bigger Hagler fan you wont find, i still think McCallum (prime) was better all round and takes a UD.

  2. #2
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post



    Watching the two (prime4prime) i think McCallum would have taken Hagler. Hagler and Hearns ducked Mike, both have said so.

    McCallum against (Real 160lb fighters) Watson, Graham, Collins, Jackson) was truely great. He also beat a great 147lb fighter in better Fashion than Hagler did in Don Curry.

    Hagler is top 3 all time fav fighters i just think mid 80s at 160 Mike would have beat him on points.

    Mike McCallum one of the greatest under-rated fighters ever. The body snatcher was the man.
    I don't dispute that McCallum was a great fighter, but Hagler is an ATG.

    Regardless of weight, Hagler's best wins are head and shoulders above those of McCallum.

    McCullum is an ATG.

    Are Haglers really better? MCCullum best 6 wins:

    1. James Toney (prime)
    2. Don Curry
    3. Steve Collins
    4. Michael Watson (Who schooled Been and Eubank)
    5. Julian Jackson (In 2 first Jabkson loss)
    6. Herol Graham
    I agree with you Marvin Hagler's resume isn't that much better, and infact you should put Sumbu Kalambay on Mike McCallum's list. He was a terrific fighter who beat Herol Graham x2, Iran Barkley, Doug DeWitt, Robbie Simms, Steve Collins.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post

    I don't dispute that McCallum was a great fighter, but Hagler is an ATG.

    Regardless of weight, Hagler's best wins are head and shoulders above those of McCallum.

    McCullum is an ATG.

    Are Haglers really better? MCCullum best 6 wins:

    1. James Toney (prime)
    2. Don Curry
    3. Steve Collins
    4. Michael Watson (Who schooled Been and Eubank)
    5. Julian Jackson (In 2 first Jabkson loss)
    6. Herol Graham
    I agree with you Marvin Hagler's resume isn't that much better, and infact you should put Sumbu Kalambay on Mike McCallum's list. He was a terrific fighter who beat Herol Graham x2, Iran Barkley, Doug DeWitt, Robbie Simms, Steve Collins.


    Im sick of the way McCallum gets knocked because he didnt get to beat up on 147lb`rs Hearns and Leonard.

    Past it he beat up prime James Toney he beat Herol Graham, Jackson, Watson, Steve Collins, Kalambay. When you look at it a guy that was a natural LMW he is great.

    McCallum mid 80s was more avoided than any fighter in History. Thats why he fought Herol Graham another fighter openly ducked by Hearns.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4385
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post



    Watching the two (prime4prime) i think McCallum would have taken Hagler. Hagler and Hearns ducked Mike, both have said so.

    McCallum against (Real 160lb fighters) Watson, Graham, Collins, Jackson) was truely great. He also beat a great 147lb fighter in better Fashion than Hagler did in Don Curry.

    Hagler is top 3 all time fav fighters i just think mid 80s at 160 Mike would have beat him on points.

    Mike McCallum one of the greatest under-rated fighters ever. The body snatcher was the man.
    I don't dispute that McCallum was a great fighter, but Hagler is an ATG.

    Regardless of weight, Hagler's best wins are head and shoulders above those of McCallum.

    McCullum is an ATG.

    Are Haglers really better? MCCullum best 6 wins:

    1. James Toney (prime)
    2. Don Curry
    3. Steve Collins
    4. Michael Watson (Who schooled Been and Eubank)
    5. Julian Jackson (In 2, first Jackson loss)
    6. Herol Graham


    McCallum was ducked by all the greats, why? because he was a great.

    Listen a bigger Hagler fan you wont find, i still think McCallum (prime) was better all round and takes a UD.
    Fair enough, hard to argue with most of that. I feel Hagler's wins are better, but I concede that you can make a case for McCallum.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post

    I don't dispute that McCallum was a great fighter, but Hagler is an ATG.

    Regardless of weight, Hagler's best wins are head and shoulders above those of McCallum.

    McCullum is an ATG.

    Are Haglers really better? MCCullum best 6 wins:

    1. James Toney (prime)
    2. Don Curry
    3. Steve Collins
    4. Michael Watson (Who schooled Been and Eubank)
    5. Julian Jackson (In 2, first Jackson loss)
    6. Herol Graham


    McCallum was ducked by all the greats, why? because he was a great.

    Listen a bigger Hagler fan you wont find, i still think McCallum (prime) was better all round and takes a UD.
    Fair enough, hard to argue with most of that. I feel Hagler's wins are better, but I concede that you can make a case for McCallum.



    Both ATG i just feel had Mike fought Tommy and Ray he would get his dues.

    Us real fans know how great Mike was in every department

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    33yo McCallum vs Watson who in prior fight destroyed Nigel Benn:


    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy5NiBY1tFM


    Total war but Mike pulled through.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1135
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Well all i got to say is this i feel Sugar Ray Leonard was a better fighter then the body snatch was i give him a chance to knock Hearns out. But i think Sugar Ray Leonard would out box him if he was fighting prime for prime SRL takes it hands down for me feel he was a better boxer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    1,347
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    969
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr140 View Post
    Well all i got to say is this i feel Sugar Ray Leonard was a better fighter then the body snatch was i give him a chance to knock Hearns out. But i think Sugar Ray Leonard would out box him if he was fighting prime for prime SRL takes it hands down for me feel he was a better boxer.


    On what basis?

    P4P its 50-50 at 154 or 160 your not saying he beats Mike?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1135
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    I said pound for pound i say the version Sugar Ray Leonard at the weight of 147 could beat the version of body snatch at 154. Kinda silly to make the fight anyhow both were prime at different weights. Also if Mike did not lose to Kalambay he would of had a fight with Duran or Hearns.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    18,766
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4385
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: kelly pavlik against past middle and light heavyweights

    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CFH View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Markusdarkus View Post


    McCullum is an ATG.

    Are Haglers really better? MCCullum best 6 wins:

    1. James Toney (prime)
    2. Don Curry
    3. Steve Collins
    4. Michael Watson (Who schooled Been and Eubank)
    5. Julian Jackson (In 2, first Jackson loss)
    6. Herol Graham


    McCallum was ducked by all the greats, why? because he was a great.

    Listen a bigger Hagler fan you wont find, i still think McCallum (prime) was better all round and takes a UD.
    Fair enough, hard to argue with most of that. I feel Hagler's wins are better, but I concede that you can make a case for McCallum.



    Both ATG i just feel had Mike fought Tommy and Ray he would get his dues.

    Us real fans know how great Mike was in every department
    If he had fought and beat Hearns and Leonard he would unquestionably be better than Hagler and nearly any other fighter I can think of.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Winky wright as an ATG Light-Middle Weight??
    By gudnite vienna in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-12-2007, 06:57 PM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-30-2007, 07:00 PM
  3. Top 10 Heavyweights of The Past 20 Years (1987-2007)
    By BoomBoom in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 03:01 AM
  4. Boxing's Best Light Heavyweights
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-12-2007, 12:32 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-27-2005, 05:35 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing