33yo McCallum vs Watson who in prior fight destroyed Nigel Benn:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy5NiBY1tFM
Total war but Mike pulled through.
33yo McCallum vs Watson who in prior fight destroyed Nigel Benn:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Vy5NiBY1tFM
Total war but Mike pulled through.
Well all i got to say is this i feel Sugar Ray Leonard was a better fighter then the body snatch was i give him a chance to knock Hearns out. But i think Sugar Ray Leonard would out box him if he was fighting prime for prime SRL takes it hands down for me feel he was a better boxer.
I said pound for pound i say the version Sugar Ray Leonard at the weight of 147 could beat the version of body snatch at 154. Kinda silly to make the fight anyhow both were prime at different weights. Also if Mike did not lose to Kalambay he would of had a fight with Duran or Hearns.
If they fought above i am not sure could go either way. Ray Leonard lost alot of prime years because of the eye thing not sure we got the best of him because of it but i feel he had the chin and the speed to outbox the body snatcher so yea i going with Sugar Ray Leonard to win the fight so yea i going with that.
Mike knocked out or stopped 8 fighters that had had either never been stopped b4 or after.
Boxing is so subjective i love it. But to suggest Leonard hangs with McCallum at 154 pr 160 is new to me. Don Curry all over again maybe earlier.
As Mike said:
"I leave the welterweights to Marvin, i mean he wont fight me he wont fight Graham. Its all his is good for"
To be fair no of those men was Sugar Ray Leonard and no way he stopping Sugar Ray Leonard only time he was stop was when he was 41.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks