How would the Foreman of the 90s do against todays HW?

[El Kabong]

The Klitschko's would beat Foreman....George was losing to Michael Moorer...George got outboxed by Tommy Morrison....George got beat by Shannon Briggs.....the Klitschko's are far better than all those guys

[killersheep]

The Klitschko's would beat Foreman....George was losing to Michael Moorer...George got outboxed by Tommy Morrison....George got beat by Shannon Briggs.....the Klitschko's are far better than all those guys

You may be right about Wlad, as far as Vitali goes, I'll reserve judgement until after this weekend, I think the 90s Foreman still was good enough to at least grab a strap in today's standards.

[Kel]

I think Wlad would maybe have been beaten as Big George could still bang but Vitali would have won a decision I reckon.

[Master]

The Klit brothers would beat that Gerorge, in fact he would not have fought them. He stands a better chance against the others but do not think he could beat Valuev either. The faster defensive boxers would also pose him a lot of trouble.

[ICB]

The Klitschko's would beat Foreman....George was losing to Michael Moorer...George got outboxed by Tommy Morrison....George got beat by Shannon Briggs.....the Klitschko's are far better than all those guys

George Foreman was 47 years old against Shannon Briggs and it was his last fight, plus by the sounds of it you haven't seen the fight. Because George Foreman was robbed against Shannon Briggs, thats why there was an investigation regarding the decision.

Michael Moorer and Tommy Morrison are much faster than both of the Klitschko brothers, Tommy Morrison had to use his feet for 12 rounds. And Michael Moorer used quick handspeed and decent movement and fought the best fight of his career. None of the Klitschko brothers are good movers, and there punches are robotic like.