Trinidad/De La Hoya Vs Hopkins

[Puya]

Not sure about that one, I'd go with DLH p4p over Hopkins.

He didn't beat either of them simply by overwhelmingly them with size and power. He outskilled them. He had better defense, he was a more accurate puncher in those fights, he was flat-out better.

I was the fact he new that none of them could hurt him.

[Bookkeeper]

Not sure about that one, I'd go with DLH p4p over Hopkins.

He didn't beat either of them simply by overwhelmingly them with size and power. He outskilled them. He had better defense, he was a more accurate puncher in those fights, he was flat-out better.

I was the fact he new that none of them could hurt him.

That's what I said, people act like Tito was not landing, but he was landing big punches that had very little effect on Hopkins, those blows at WW or SW would have KO'd someone

[ICB]

He didn't beat either of them simply by overwhelmingly them with size and power. He outskilled them. He had better defense, he was a more accurate puncher in those fights, he was flat-out better.

I was the fact he new that none of them could hurt him.

That's what I said, people act like Tito was not landing, but he was landing big punches that had very little effect on Hopkins, those blows at WW or SW would have KO'd someone

Agreed all you have to do is look at the short list of fighters, that went the distance with Felix Trinidad in his prime Pernell Whitaker, ODLH, Hector Camacho, David Reid,

David Reid never recovered from that beating, ODLH had to use his feet all night to survive. Hector Camacho is tougher than a coffin nail, and so is Pernell Whitaker but even Pernell Whitaker suffered a broken jaw.