The Truth About Vitali Vs. Peter

**littlebif** · 10-12-2008 05:02 PM

Peters was very poor last night he stood in range with out doing anything so he was getting picked off.He didnt listen to a thing his corner was telling him to do.

**Snakey** · 10-12-2008 06:44 PM

All of those flaws didnt show up over night. Theyve always had them but in Vitalis case, they work for him very well and i would not call them a flaw. Not technically correct but either is calzaghes punching style but it works for him. Valuev....ahhahaha the biggest problem people have with valuev is against such a big man. Vitali is 6'8, it will be like a 6'0 man fighting a 6'5 guy, not a heap of difference if you think about it like that.

**Bomp** · 10-12-2008 06:51 PM

Originally Posted by snakey

All of those flaws didnt show up over night. Theyve always had them but in Vitalis case, they work for him very well and i would not call them a flaw. Not technically correct but either is calzaghes punching style but it works for him. Valuev....ahhahaha the biggest problem people have with valuev is against such a big man. Vitali is 6'8, it will be like a 6'0 man fighting a 6'5 guy, not a heap of difference if you think about it like that.

Agreed, Klit's hands were low but he utilised his height advantage well to maintin distance. I've no doubt his approach would be different against /valuev, but he has the tools to deal with the big guy IMO.