Well if Tyson fought Holyfield in an alley, Holyfield would be earless as a seal..
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Well if Tyson fought Holyfield in an alley, Holyfield would be earless as a seal..
Array
George Foreman vs Ron Lyle probably wouldn't look much different...
I think there's lots of guys could kick floyd mayweather's @$$ in a street-fight.
Mayweather's style is the ultimate exploitation of Boxing rules which results in a style that can win a boxing match on points in a boxing ring, but is non-functional elsewhere. If Mayweather struck a man bare-fisted in the street, he'd break his fragile hands without doing any serious damage to his adversary.
Boxing was once "The Noble Art of Self-Defense", and that real-world application as self-defense is how I view Boxing, not at all as a sport/game that is becoming the popular assessment of it ie Olympic Boxing.
With that touch-for-points amateur system, plenty of developing fighters develop bad habits and never learn how to throw a real punch with their body-weight behind it (Paulie Malignaggi, Paul Williams, Winky Wright, Joe Calzaghe, Floyd Mayweather, Cory Spinks, Chris Byrd)
Where in the hell but in a Boxing ring would Muhammad Ali's rope-a-dope strategy have any hand-to-hand combat value at all?
James Toney, Glengoffe Johnson, Edison Pantera Miranda, Arthur Abraham, Ricardo Mayorga, Edwin Valero, Antonio Margarito, Miguel Cotto, Zab Judah are some guys that would f*<k you up in a street-fight though.
Who cares though? When did anyone say that boxing was the end all of street self defence? You just sound like some yuppie MMA fan trying to downplay subtle aspects of the sport that have been around forever. What on earth are you talking about a new breed who never learn to throw a real punch?? There have always been evasive fighters who fight off the back foot, or pressure fighters who sacrifice punching power in order to throw an accumulation of shots. If it were as simple as "not throwing a real punch", then other guys wouldv'e been capitalizing on it and those guys wouldn't have been great boxers.
Agreed what the hell is this guy on about ? why has boxing got to be just about brawling ? boxing is also an art and i do love watching fighters like Floyd Mayweather, Pernell Whitaker, and infact i've seen both men have to exchange toe to toe and take flush punches.
And also Larry Holmes was a boxer who used his great jab and his outside game to never let his opponents get in, and he rarely brawled only if he had to. But look what he did to Trevor Berbick in a street fight ? he kicked his ass. I think its stupid to base boxing styles, on how a certain boxer would do in a street fight.
Array
I saw a supposed tidy boxer get bashed up by a piss-head once after offering him outside.
Boxing and fighting are totally different. There's no rules in a REAL fight.
(sorry for the obvious cliches)
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
To clarify:
No where did I write that Boxing was supposed to be the end all of street self-defense.
Fellas, fellas,
This thread IS in fact about "...What If It were In an Alley?",
not about a slick boxing match with rules in a boxing ring (which I have great appreciation for.) I'm on-topic here.
These comments above are a bit elitist and preachy like I'm somehow missing the mark regarding scientific boxing, but I've been watching this sport for over 25 years. What if it were in an alley, fellas? That's the discussion here, not slick scientific boxing within rules.
Would you be intimidated AT ALL if a pure boxer like Ivan Calderon was coming at you in a street-fight?
Do you think it would be wise for you to employ Ali's rope-a-dope technique if you were in a streetfight?
Lean up against a lightpole or brick wall and let the opponent hit you for 20 minutes or so until he's tired out?
The modern amateur system is in fact NOT conducive to producing a good professional.
^ I stand by every word I wrote here. This thread is about "...In an alley."
The point I would make is there are some fighters who would come out the winner whether in a Boxing match, MMA match, or a street-fight, and some slicksters who would get killed in a streetfight.
Billy Conn was pretty damn slick, but without much power.
His father-in-law knocked him out in a street-fight.
Regarding the MMA yuppie crack:
It is my belief that many world-class boxers could become MMA champions with about 18 to 24 months of grappling training.
Talent pool is the difference.
About 19 thousand pros in Boxing contrasted with about 5 thousand or so pro MMA fighters. That tells the tale right there.
The cream-of-the-crop of combat athletes will ALWAYS go where the REAL money is. 8 million or so per fight in Boxing contrasted with about 150 thousand per fight in the UFC. Higher Affliction payouts are a good sign though.
Array
Floyd Mayweather would still beat 99% of 147 pound evryday joes in the world in a street fight. He'd avoid punches, be strong and fit, and still hit harder and faster than almost anyone that size. He would have great self defence. Just cos some world class fighters might be tougher dont mean he wouldnt still be good in a street fight.
True, but if Mayweather met Hatton or Castillo in an alley, my money would be on Hatton or Castillo. Hatton would ground and pound Floyd Matt Hughes style.
Of the fighters today, I would put my money on Tony Margarito over almost anybody. I seriously think Tony could whip Joe Calzaghe in an alley.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks