
Originally Posted by
WelshDevilRob
Haye would have beaten Peter and Vitali
Like others I'm left wondering if klitschko was that good or Peter was that bad.
Peter was dreadfully slow while Klitschko used his height effectively.
Peter hasn't looked good for a few fights now - he didn't impress against McCline or Toney. He looked like a fighter who just turned up without any real ambition or desire.
Maybe you didn't see the second fight against Toney where Peter used effective defense and managed to knock Toney down. And you should be considering why McCline suddenly became an all-out aggressive fighter when he was only that briefly at the beginning of his career.
Klitschko's hands were low because he had no reason to keep them up.
Yet again, making Haye the crowned king in a division he's yet to show any dominance in whatsoever.
You'd have a point if either guy fought as Cruiserweights.
Klitschko has just had a fight after a 4 year lay-off. Let's say we reserve judgment until after he's had at least one more fight.

Originally Posted by
WelshDevilRob
Haye has all the skills, reflexes, power and movement to have beaten both last night.
Peter is rapidly approaching my garbage pile. That being said, I have no confidence that Haye could beat him. He has a head like a rock and if you give up your height to Peter he will eat you alive. Haye has a wider stance than Senator Larry Craig in a men's room.
Bookmarks