Curious...How does everyone here think the P4P rankings work?

[Fenster]

Simple just do some basic analysis of fighters and plug those numbers into this simple equation



I've never been good at or put too much stock in p4p lists, it is just impossible to define, I think criteria for me is someone that shows consistent domination over class opponents over time. I try to stick with actual judges decisions, instead of how I feel a fight went. To do things like say is Calzaghe or JMM more worthy oof a number 2 p4p spot, I can't do it, I might try, but in the end it's all subjective and has no meaning.

That's the thing, if you ask everyone for the their current list, almost everyone will have the same names, just in a slightly different order.

There is no right or wrong.

[killersheep]

Simple just do some basic analysis of fighters and plug those numbers into this simple equation



I've never been good at or put too much stock in p4p lists, it is just impossible to define, I think criteria for me is someone that shows consistent domination over class opponents over time. I try to stick with actual judges decisions, instead of how I feel a fight went. To do things like say is Calzaghe or JMM more worthy oof a number 2 p4p spot, I can't do it, I might try, but in the end it's all subjective and has no meaning.

That's the thing, if you ask everyone for the their current list, almost everyone will have the same names, just in a slightly different order.

There is no right or wrong.

I agree about the top guys in a p4p list, but once you get down to 7,8,9 and 10 on the list, it gets even more blurry.