I would also like to see Hopkins vs Calzaghe 2 but if it isn't to be it isn't to be anyway with a bit of look Jones will beat Calzaghe and we will get Hopkins vs Jones 2.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
I would also like to see Hopkins vs Calzaghe 2 but if it isn't to be it isn't to be anyway with a bit of look Jones will beat Calzaghe and we will get Hopkins vs Jones 2.
Last edited by Tysonbruno; 10-20-2008 at 12:55 PM.
Array
My guess? Jones wouldn't fight Hopkins. His logic? "I beat Calzaghe who beat Hopkins who beat Tarver who beat Johnson" That avenges all my losses in one go, and proves that I am the greatest of all time".
Calzaghe is the guy who is least likely to inflict physical damage. If he loses to Calzaghe, there will be an excuse. "I'm tired" probably.
Calzaghe had adapted to Hopkins he is like the Borg man real ring and style smart.
If Hopkins offered to fight him in Cardiff i dont think Joe would turn that down.
Array
I dont mind Calzaghe retiring,then again i would'nt mind him fighting Hopkins again.Calzaghe has proven to all of the doubters out there and he's got nothing to prove after he beats Jones!!!Im looking forward to Calzaghe's new dvd soon.Its due out in November,it should be good!
Hopkins doesnt need Calzaghe anyway cuz alot of people think he won that fight
If the judges gave him the close decisions to Taylor and Joe . Im not saying the fights would be any different just different judges on a different night then that makes Hopkins' resume unrivalled. What an amazing career . Hes been fighting and beating undefeated p4p fighters.
If Joe wont fight Hopkins maybe Jones will
Array
Calzaghe won't fight Hopkins again because it would be a massive risk of losing that unbeaten record he knows he got a gift.
Array
If joe looses to roy will anyone care about this rematch then ?? They fought joe won time to move on. If b-hop thinks he got ripped he needs to look in the mirrior and bitch to that guy about it. The same way he feels joe didn't do enough to win he could've done much more to convince the judges that there was a clear winner. I'm in the middle of the fence on this fight, and would say the same to either guy, it doesn't matter who we think won, only who the judges think won, best bet is to not leave so much room for interpretation. This weekend was a good example is there anyone out there that thought pavlik may have won this fight ?? There was no rematch clause joe has the right to say no. I think roy wins and shuts up all this discussion anyways.....but then again i am on a two fight prediction skid right now so that might be good news for joe.
Hidden Content Click clack ! Give up the purse.........or yetti will find you.
Array
Array
I'm actually pulling for a Roy Jones win so that we can get a Hopkins/Jones rematch. Even at this stage, it would bring a lot of intererst.
I can see why Calzaghe would reject a rematch, he just beat Hopkins. I can see why Hopkins wants a rematch, he knows he can definitively beat Calzaghe. Either way, Joe may have nothing left to prove, but I do think his victory over Bernard wasn't 100% clear being that many thought Bernard won. I would like to see a rematch but I don't think Joe wants any part of the B-Hop we saw last Saturday.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks